Hi,
I have a question regarding how the clusters are labeled after the results of a Monte-Carlo Simulation. Similar regions from 2 different patient populations seem to be labeled differently. On one of my results, the cluster has been labeled as in the precentral region and a similar region on another population seems to be labeled as superior frontal region. Is the labeling based on which region the majority of significant vertices fall under? In that case, would a cluster that kind of falls over 2 regions of the brain be labeled as the one with more vertices?
Thanks for all the help Koushik
Hi freesurfers, I tried to download the tutorial dataset for inspection of fs output, but receive this error message repeatedly, even with the -c flag:
glia:shantanu[30] wget -c ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/data/buckner_data-tutorial_subjs.tar.gz --2012-04-20 15:27:05-- ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/data/buckner_data-tutorial_subjs.tar.gz => buckner_data-tutorial_subjs.tar.gz Resolving surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu... 132.183.202.158 Connecting to surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu|132.183.202.158|:21... connected. Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in! ==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done. ==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD (1) /pub/data ... done. ==> SIZE buckner_data-tutorial_subjs.tar.gz ... 11245151143 ==> PASV ... done. ==> REST 4704874496 ... done. ==> RETR buckner_data-tutorial_subjs.tar.gz ... done. Length: 11245151143 (10G), 6540276647 (6.1G) remaining (unauthoritative)
43% [+++++++++++++++ ] 4,852,605,832 6.82M/s in 22s
buckner_data-tutorial_subjs.tar.gz: Input/output error, closing control connection.
Thanks in advance for any help. -shantanu
Hi Koushik, it just uses the label of the maximum. doug
On 04/19/2012 05:30 PM, Govindarajan, Koushik Athreya wrote:
Hi,
I have a question regarding how the clusters are labeled after the results of a Monte-Carlo Simulation. Similar regions from 2 different patient populations seem to be labeled differently. On one of my results, the cluster has been labeled as in the precentral region and a similar region on another population seems to be labeled as superior frontal region. Is the labeling based on which region the majority of significant vertices fall under? In that case, would a cluster that kind of falls over 2 regions of the brain be labeled as the one with more vertices?
Thanks for all the help Koushik
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Douglas N Greve -
Govindarajan, Koushik Athreya -
Shantanu Ghosh