What is the current opinion on using cortical volumes rather than reporting on thickness?
Sincerest thanks, Lindsay
Hi Lindsay
they are both biologically relevant measures, it's just a question of what you are investigating. If you are doing volume it's probably worth decommposing it into surface area and thickness though to understand the underlying neurobiology better Bruce
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Lindsay Ercole wrote:
What is the current opinion on using cortical volumes rather than reporting on thickness?
Sincerest thanks, Lindsay
Run mris_preproc with the --meas volume option. Make sure to get an up-to-date version of mris_preproc ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/mris_preproc doug
Lindsay Ercole wrote:
What is the current opinion on using cortical volumes rather than reporting on thickness?
Sincerest thanks, Lindsay
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Bruce Fischl -
Douglas N Greve -
Lindsay Ercole