Dear Douglas,
Thanks for your explanation. These information are helpful to me.
I'm not sure what you mean. How can it be a delay if it is after the trial is over?
I’m sorry for I didn’t describe my second question well. I think I can take another situation to describe my question.
If I have a experiment that present stimulus until participants response, and I know the average RT of this experiment is 1500 ms after pilot test.
In this situation, should I +/- the duration of jitter/null condition in terms of the duration of each stimulus?
For example, if a part of sequence Optseq2 output is “ Con1 Null(500 ms) Con2 Null(1500 ms)”, and one of participants takes 1000 ms to response for Con1.
Should I add 500 ms to the first Null? or I don’t need to anything?
Thanks for your reading.
Best Regards, Chih-Hao
Please remember to include previous correspondence in your email.
On 08/01/2016 04:22 AM, 連 志浩 wrote:
Dear Douglas,
Thanks for your explanation. These information are helpful to me.
I'm not sure what you mean. How can it be a delay if it is after
thetrial is over?
I’m sorry for I didn’t describe my second question well. I think I can take another situation to describe my question.
If I have a experiment that present stimulus until participants response, and I know the average RT of this experiment is 1500 ms after pilot test.
In this situation, should I +/- the duration of jitter/null condition in terms of the duration of each stimulus?
For example, if a part of sequence Optseq2 output is “ Con1 Null(500 ms) Con2 Null(1500 ms)”, and one of participants takes 1000 ms to response for Con1.
Should I add 500 ms to the first Null? or I don’t need to anything?
Thanks for your reading.
Best Regards,
Chih-Hao
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu