Dear Freesurfers
Hi
I was checking the functional on structural data registration quality by using the below command.
tkregister-sess -s $subj -fsd bold -per-run -bbr-sum
I observed high values (around 0.9) for one of my subjects, and I figured out, that subject was registered to another subject's structural data by mistake.
I re-did the recon (in a new folder) and checked the registration again, the values are still the same! However when I check my log files, it seems that the recon is done correctly and the snapshots from QA_tools don't look bad.
I appreciate if you could please let me know what you think.
Thanks a lot
Mona
Zahra (Mona) Nasiriavanaki
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
Massachusetts General Hospital
149 13th Street, 149-2615
Charlestown, MA, USA, 02129
Did you delete the bad registration file and re-run the registration (preproc-sess)?
On 3/18/19 11:53 AM, Nasiriavanaki, Zahra wrote:
Dear Freesurfers
Hi
I was checking the functional on structural data registration quality by using the below command.
tkregister-sess -s $subj -fsd bold -per-run -bbr-sum
I observed high values (around 0.9) for one of my subjects, and I figured out, that subject was registered to another subject's structural data by mistake.
I re-did the recon (in a new folder) and checked the registration again, the values are still the same! However when I check my log files, it seems that the recon is done correctly and the snapshots from QA_tools don't look bad.
I appreciate if you could please let me know what you think.
Thanks a lot
Mona
Zahra (Mona) Nasiriavanaki
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
Massachusetts General Hospital
149 13th Street, 149-2615
Charlestown, MA, USA, 02129
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
I changed my SUBJECTS_DIR folder, but I did not delete the old one at that time.
________________________________ From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. DGREVE@mgh.harvard.edu Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 12:34:47 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] tkregister-sess
Did you delete the bad registration file and re-run the registration (preproc-sess)?
On 3/18/19 11:53 AM, Nasiriavanaki, Zahra wrote:
Dear Freesurfers
Hi
I was checking the functional on structural data registration quality by using the below command.
tkregister-sess -s $subj -fsd bold -per-run -bbr-sum
I observed high values (around 0.9) for one of my subjects, and I figured out, that subject was registered to another subject's structural data by mistake.
I re-did the recon (in a new folder) and checked the registration again, the values are still the same! However when I check my log files, it seems that the recon is done correctly and the snapshots from QA_tools don't look bad.
I appreciate if you could please let me know what you think.
Thanks a lot
Mona
Zahra (Mona) Nasiriavanaki
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
Massachusetts General Hospital
149 13th Street, 149-2615
Charlestown, MA, USA, 02129
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu