Dear Experts When I use " mris_fill" to fill inside a surface; the output volume dimension increases from 256 to such a huge number ( 700 or so). I'm not sure what the case is. I'd appreciate your help with it. Regards
it's because we typically fill at a higher resolution to try to preserve as much of the surface topology as we can. Try using the -r flag to change the resolution (e.g. -r 1 should keep the dimensions) On Sat, 28 Oct 2017, Fereshte wrote:
Dear Experts When I use " mris_fill" to fill inside a surface; the output volume dimension increases from 256 to such a huge number ( 700 or so). I'm not sure what the case is. I'd appreciate your help with it. Regards
So does it mean there would be some topology defects in lower dimensions?
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 10:59 PM Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
it's because we typically fill at a higher resolution to try to preserve as much of the surface topology as we can. Try using the -r flag to change the resolution (e.g. -r 1 should keep the dimensions) On Sat, 28 Oct 2017, Fereshte wrote:
Dear Experts When I use " mris_fill" to fill inside a surface; the
output volume dimension increases from
256 to such a huge number ( 700 or so). I'm not sure what the case is.
I'd appreciate your help with it.
Regards
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Bruce Fischl -
Fereshte