Hi Antonin and Thomas,

Thanks a lot for your reply.

I just wanted to confirm once again with you following steps. I ran: (1). mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage --trgsubject yoursubject --hemi lh --sval-annot lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot --tval $SUBJECTS_DIR/yoursubject/label/lh.Yeo_7Network_native.annot

(2). mri_segstats --annot my_subject_id lh lh.Yeo_7Network_native.annot --i $SUBJECTS_DIR/my_subject_id/surf/lh.pial_lgi --sum lh.aparc.pial_lgi.stats

These two steps are working fine and giving me 7 values in 'stats' file. These 7 values represent lgi values of 7 networks, is that correct? I am not sure why we do not need step mri_label2vol here as mentioned by Thomas. If I run mri_label2vol step, it requires reghead flag input, which I do not have.

Another question: If we do not need mri_label2vol step and steps (1) and (2) above are correct to get LGI values of 7 networks, could you please tell me how can I display LGI values (average over subjects) in fsaverage space for publication purpose?

Thanks a lot.

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Thomas Yeo ythomas@csail.mit.edu wrote:

Hi Martin,

Sorry for the slow reply. Antonin is right about the mri_segstats.

To map the surface parcellation from fsaverage to your individual subject's anatomical space, you can do the following:

# Transform from fsaverage to subject's surface

...

...

mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage --trgsubject yoursubject --hemi lh

--sval-annot lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot --tval $SUBJECTS_DIR/yoursubject/label/lh.Yeo_17Network_native.annot

# Transform from subject's surface into your subject's volume (I am not super sure about this. You probably want to double check the output is correct)

...

...

mri_label2vol --annot lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.HS_001.annot --o

outfile.nii.gz --hemi lh --subject HS_001 --regheader

Regards, Thomas

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Antonin Skoch ansk@ikem.cz wrote:

...

Dear Martin,

I think that this thread is relevant for you:

http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg34508.html

You would have to map Yeo atlas to individual brain and then extract the

LGI

...

values using command:

mri_segstats --annot my_subject_id lh aparc --i $SUBJECTS_DIR/my_subject_id/surf/lh.pial_lgi --sum

lh.aparc.pial_lgi.stats

...

where aparc replace by name of your generated Yeo atlas annot file.

Regards,

Antonin Skoch

Hi everyone,

I was wondering if someone could please address the following question regarding FreeSurfer usage.

I would really appreciate any help.

Thanks.

Hi,

I used following command to extract LGI values from a set of subjects:

recon-all -s <subj> -localGI

Output stats is saved in lh.aparc_lgi.stats file. By default, its calculating LGI values of 35 areas using *Desikan-Killiany Atlas *but I

am

...

interested in calculating LGI values using Yeo atlas of 7 networks. I was wondering how can I change the default atlas to Yeo atlas to get LGI

value

...

for each subject.

Thanks a lot.

---

Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom

it is

...

addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you

in

...

error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.

---

Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer