Dear All, I ran a test subject on VM and the process took 20 hrs to complete.But the same images on Mc pro took 58 hours.VM is 8GB and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed this delay happening in the past as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a single patient and Mc takes 24-30 for the same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which would be more accurate,and does it mean that more time FS take,the better the results? Many thanks Chikku
no, the longer time is probably because the mac version you are using is 32 bit.
cheers Bruce
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Varghese Chikku wrote:
Dear All,I ran a test subject on VM and the process took 20 hrs to complete.But the same images on Mc pro took 58 hours.VM is 8GB and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed this delay happening in the past as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a single patient and Mc takes 24-30 for the same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which would be more accurate,and does it mean that more time FS take,the better the results? Many thanks Chikku
Thanks Bruce,Its 64 bit.
On 29 January 2013 15:12, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
no, the longer time is probably because the mac version you are using is 32 bit.
cheers Bruce
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Varghese Chikku wrote:
Dear All,I ran a test subject on VM and the process took 20 hrs to
complete.But the same images on Mc pro took 58 hours.VM is 8GB and Mpro
is 16 GB.I have noticed this delay happening in the past as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a single patient and Mc takes 24-30 for the same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which would be more accurate,and does it mean that more time FS take,the better the results? Many thanks Chikku
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/**compliancelinehttp://www.partners.org/complianceline. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi Chikku
note that because you have a 64 bit mac doesn't mean you are running 64 bit software. Until pretty recently we didn't have a 64 bit mac version, so unless you downloaded a beta in the last month or so, you are likely running a 32 bit version
cheers Bruce On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Varghese Chikku wrote:
Thanks Bruce,Its 64 bit.
On 29 January 2013 15:12, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: no, the longer time is probably because the mac version you are using is 32 bit.
cheers Bruce On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Varghese Chikku wrote: Dear All,I ran a test subject on VM and the process took 20 hrs to complete.But the same images on Mc pro took 58 hours.VM is 8GB and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed this delay happening in the past as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a single patient and Mc takes 24-30 for the same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which would be more accurate,and does it mean that more time FS take,the better the results? Many thanks ChikkuThe information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Chikku,
Can you send us your recon-all.log and recon-all.cmd files? I'd like to investigate why it ran so slowly.
Nick
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 06:53 +0100, Varghese Chikku wrote:
Dear All, I ran a test subject on VM and the process took 20 hrs to complete.But the same images on Mc pro took 58 hours.VM is 8GB and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed this delay happening in the past as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a single patient and Mc takes 24-30 for the same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which would be more accurate,and does it mean that more time FS take,the better the results? Many thanks Chikku _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Thanks Nick, Please find the attached.
On 29 January 2013 19:33, Nick Schmansky nicks@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Chikku,
Can you send us your recon-all.log and recon-all.cmd files? I'd like to investigate why it ran so slowly.
Nick
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 06:53 +0100, Varghese Chikku wrote:
Dear All, I ran a test subject on VM and the process took 20 hrs to complete.But the same images on Mc pro took 58 hours.VM is 8GB and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed this delay happening in the past as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a single patient and Mc takes 24-30 for the same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which would be more accurate,and does it mean that more time FS take,the better the results? Many thanks Chikku _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
SubCortGrayVol on Mac is 208022 and 296990 on VM, for the same patient.Does the processing time have something to with the results,it varies a lot.
On 29 January 2013 19:33, Nick Schmansky nicks@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Chikku,
Can you send us your recon-all.log and recon-all.cmd files? I'd like to investigate why it ran so slowly.
Nick
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 06:53 +0100, Varghese Chikku wrote:
Dear All, I ran a test subject on VM and the process took 20 hrs to complete.But the same images on Mc pro took 58 hours.VM is 8GB and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed this delay happening in the past as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a single patient and Mc takes 24-30 for the same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which would be more accurate,and does it mean that more time FS take,the better the results? Many thanks Chikku _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
oh, that's way too big a difference. Something is wrong On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Varghese Chikku wrote:
SubCortGrayVol on Mac is 208022 and 296990 on VM, for the same patient.Does the processing time have something to with the results,it varies a lot.
On 29 January 2013 19:33, Nick Schmansky nicks@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Chikku,
Can you send us your recon-all.log and recon-all.cmd files? I'd like to investigate why it ran so slowly. Nick On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 06:53 +0100, Varghese Chikku wrote: > Dear All, > I ran a test subject on VM and the process took 20 hrs to > complete.But the same images on Mc pro took 58 hours.VM is 8GB > and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed this delay happening in the past > as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a single patient and Mc takes > 24-30 for the same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this > happening?.Which would be more accurate,and does it mean that more > time FS take,the better the results? > Many thanks > Chikku
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Bruce Fischl -
Nick Schmansky -
Varghese Chikku