Dear Freesurfer users,
We have an MNI mask and we want to apply this mask on a group of subjects for small volume correction. so we did the following steps:
1. cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/surf fslregister --s fsaverage --mov /path/to/TT_avg152T1.nii --reg TT_avg152T1_to_fsaverage.dat
2. cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/surf mri_vol2surf --mov /path/to/ROI5.nii --reg TT_avg152T1_to_fsaverage.dat --projdist-max 0 1 0.1 --interp nearest --hemi lh --out lh.fsaverage.ROI5.mgh
3. cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/surf mri_surf2surf --s subjid --trgsubject fsaverage --hemi lh --sval lh.thickness --tval lh.thickness.fsaverage.mgh . . . Surf2Surf: Dividing by number of hits (163842) INFO: nSrcLost = 0 nTrg121 = 147410, nTrgMulti = 16432, MnTrgMultiHits = 2.25237 nSrc121 = 86069, nSrcLost = 0, nSrcMulti = 42416, MnSrcMultiHits = 2.31875 Saving target data
4. Next step was just for verifying, but we received an error (maybe it's not so important): cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/surf mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/surf/lh.fsaverage.ROI5.mgh --in lh.thickness.fsaverage.mgh --sum segstats-ROI5.txt
Loading /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/fsaverage/surf/lh.fsaverage.ROI5.mgh Loading lh.thickness.fsaverage.mgh ERROR: dimension mismatch between input volume and seg
We want to determine the statistics only for this mask for the whole group of subjects (qdec, or mri_glmfit). If the mapping of our subjects thickness data was good, what should we do next in order to achieve our goal ?
Thank you.
Best regards, Dr. Alexandru Hanganu ___________________________________
Department of Neurology, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital, Kiel Campus Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, building no. 41 D-24105 Kiel, Germany.
Alexandru,
You will want to add the flag --reshape to the mri_surf2surf command. That will fix the dimension mismatch problem.
Nick
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 14:43 +0000, Alexandru Hanganu wrote:
Dear Freesurfer users,
We have an MNI mask and we want to apply this mask on a group of subjects for small volume correction. so we did the following steps:
- cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/surf
fslregister --s fsaverage --mov /path/to/TT_avg152T1.nii --reg TT_avg152T1_to_fsaverage.dat
- cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/surf
mri_vol2surf --mov /path/to/ROI5.nii --reg TT_avg152T1_to_fsaverage.dat --projdist-max 0 1 0.1 --interp nearest --hemi lh --out lh.fsaverage.ROI5.mgh
- cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/surf
mri_surf2surf --s subjid --trgsubject fsaverage --hemi lh --sval lh.thickness --tval lh.thickness.fsaverage.mgh . . . Surf2Surf: Dividing by number of hits (163842) INFO: nSrcLost = 0 nTrg121 = 147410, nTrgMulti = 16432, MnTrgMultiHits = 2.25237 nSrc121 = 86069, nSrcLost = 0, nSrcMulti = 42416, MnSrcMultiHits = 2.31875 Saving target data
- Next step was just for verifying, but we received an error (maybe
it's not so important): cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/surf mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/surf/lh.fsaverage.ROI5.mgh --in lh.thickness.fsaverage.mgh --sum segstats-ROI5.txt
Loading /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/fsaverage/surf/lh.fsaverage.ROI5.mgh Loading lh.thickness.fsaverage.mgh ERROR: dimension mismatch between input volume and seg
We want to determine the statistics only for this mask for the whole group of subjects (qdec, or mri_glmfit). If the mapping of our subjects thickness data was good, what should we do next in order to achieve our goal ?
Thank you.
Best regards, Dr. Alexandru Hanganu ___________________________________ Department of Neurology, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital, Kiel Campus Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, building no. 41 D-24105 Kiel, Germany.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Try adding --noreshape to both mri_vol2surf and mri_surf2surf cmd lines.
doug
Alexandru Hanganu wrote:
Dear Freesurfer users,
We have an MNI mask and we want to apply this mask on a group of subjects for small volume correction. so we did the following steps:
- cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/surf
fslregister --s fsaverage --mov /path/to/TT_avg152T1.nii --reg TT_avg152T1_to_fsaverage.dat
- cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/surf
mri_vol2surf --mov /path/to/ROI5.nii --reg TT_avg152T1_to_fsaverage.dat --projdist-max 0 1 0.1 --interp nearest --hemi lh --out lh.fsaverage.ROI5.mgh
- cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/surf
mri_surf2surf --s subjid --trgsubject fsaverage --hemi lh --sval lh.thickness --tval lh.thickness.fsaverage.mgh . . . Surf2Surf: Dividing by number of hits (163842) INFO: nSrcLost = 0 nTrg121 = 147410, nTrgMulti = 16432, MnTrgMultiHits = 2.25237 nSrc121 = 86069, nSrcLost = 0, nSrcMulti = 42416, MnSrcMultiHits = 2.31875 Saving target data
- Next step was just for verifying, but we received an error (maybe
it's not so important): cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/surf mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/surf/lh.fsaverage.ROI5.mgh --in lh.thickness.fsaverage.mgh --sum segstats-ROI5.txt
Loading /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/fsaverage/surf/lh.fsaverage.ROI5.mgh Loading lh.thickness.fsaverage.mgh ERROR: dimension mismatch between input volume and seg
We want to determine the statistics only for this mask for the whole group of subjects (qdec, or mri_glmfit). If the mapping of our subjects thickness data was good, what should we do next in order to achieve our goal ?
Thank you.
Best regards, Dr. Alexandru Hanganu ___________________________________ Department of Neurology, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital, Kiel Campus Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, building no. 41 D-24105 Kiel, Germany.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Thank you Nick, and Doug for your answers. I used both "--reshape" flag and "--noreshape" flag and the results after "mri_segstats" were in both cases: . . . Voxel Volume is 1 mm^3 Generating list of segmentation ids Found 2 segmentations Computing statistics for each segmentation 0 0 134504 134504 1 1 29338 29338
Reporting on 2 segmentations
So I understand that these are the thickness data of the mask I used. Are these data in mm ? Because when using "mris_anatomical_stats" command line to see the thickness - the data is in mm, and is very different.
Sincerely, Alex.
what's your cmd? You need to make sure to add --in lh.thickness to get thickness in the summary file
Alexandru Hanganu wrote:
Thank you Nick, and Doug for your answers. I used both "--reshape" flag and "--noreshape" flag and the results after "mri_segstats" were in both cases: . . . Voxel Volume is 1 mm^3 Generating list of segmentation ids Found 2 segmentations Computing statistics for each segmentation 0 0 134504 134504 1 1 29338 29338
Reporting on 2 segmentationsSo I understand that these are the thickness data of the mask I used. Are these data in mm ? Because when using "mris_anatomical_stats" command line to see the thickness - the data is in mm, and is very different.
Sincerely, Alex.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Hi Everyone,
Could you please tell us why in the summary file (segstats-ROI5.txt) there are two datas about thickness for the Mask that we applyed ?
Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 Mean StdDev Min Max Range 1 0 148111 148111.0 2.4249 0.9403 -0.5673 5.00 5.5673 2 1 15731 15731.0 2.3929 0.7417 0.8352 4.45 3.6158
Sincerely, Alex.
________________________________ Von: Doug Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu An: Alexandru Hanganu hanganu..alexandru@yahoo.de CC: FS Mailing List Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Gesendet: Montag, den 8. Dezember 2008, 19:41:52 Uhr Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] Statistic analysing for a mask
what's your cmd? You need to make sure to add --in lh.thickness to get thickness in the summary file
Alexandru Hanganu wrote: Thank you Nick, and Doug for your answers.. I used both "--reshape" flag and "--noreshape" flag and the results after "mri_segstats" were in both cases: . . . Voxel Volume is 1 mm^3 Generating list of segmentation ids Found 2 segmentations Computing statistics for each segmentation 0 0 134504 134504 1 1 29338 29338
Reporting on 2 segmentations
So I understand that these are the thickness data of the mask I used. Are these data in mm ? Because when using "mris_anatomical_stats" command line to see the thickness - the data is in mm, and is very different.
Sincerely, Alex.
________________________________
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Alex,
The second one is for your label. The first one is for everything else outside the label.
Nick
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 18:04 +0000, Alexandru Hanganu wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Could you please tell us why in the summary file (segstats-ROI5.txt) there are two datas about thickness for the Mask that we applyed ?
Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 Mean StdDev Min Max Range 1 0 148111 148111.0 2.4249 0.9403 -0.5673 5.00 5.5673 2 1 15731 15731.0 2.3929 0.7417 0.8352 4.45 3.6158
Sincerely, Alex.
Von: Doug Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu An: Alexandru Hanganu hanganu.alexandru@yahoo.de CC: FS Mailing List Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Gesendet: Montag, den 8. Dezember 2008, 19:41:52 Uhr Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] Statistic analysing for a mask
what's your cmd? You need to make sure to add --in lh.thickness to get thickness in the summary file
Alexandru Hanganu wrote:
Thank you Nick, and Doug for your answers. I used both "--reshape" flag and "--noreshape" flag and the results after "mri_segstats" were in both cases:
. . . Voxel Volume is 1 mm^3 Generating list of segmentation ids Found 2 segmentations Computing statistics for each segmentation 0 0 134504 134504 1 1 29338 29338 Reporting on 2 segmentationsSo I understand that these are the thickness data of the mask I used. Are these data in mm ? Because when using "mris_anatomical_stats" command line to see the thickness - the data is in mm, and is very different.
Sincerely, Alex.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard..edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
In order to help us help you, please follow the steps in: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
Von: Doug Greve <greve@nmr..mgh.harvard.edu> An: Alexandru Hanganu hanganu.alexandru@yahoo.de CC: FS Mailing List Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Gesendet: Montag, den 8. Dezember 2008, 18:51:32 Uhr Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] Statistic analysing for a mask
Try adding --noreshape to both mri_vol2surf and mri_surf2surf cmd lines.
doug
Alexandru Hanganu wrote:
Dear Freesurfer users,
We have an MNI mask and we want to apply this mask on a group of subjects for small volume correction. so we did the following steps:
- cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/surf
fslregister --s fsaverage --mov /path/to/TT_avg152T1.nii --reg TT_avg152T1_to_fsaverage.dat
- cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/surf
mri_vol2surf --mov /path/to/ROI5.nii --reg TT_avg152T1_to_fsaverage.dat --projdist-max 0 1 0.1 --interp nearest --hemi lh --out lh.fsaverage.ROI5.mgh
- cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/surf
mri_surf2surf --s subjid --trgsubject fsaverage --hemi lh --sval lh.thickness --tval lh.thickness.fsaverage.mgh . . . Surf2Surf: Dividing by number of hits (163842) INFO: nSrcLost = 0 nTrg121 = 147410, nTrgMulti = 16432, MnTrgMultiHits = 2.25237 nSrc121 = 86069, nSrcLost = 0, nSrcMulti = 42416, MnSrcMultiHits = 2.31875 Saving target data
- Next step was just for verifying, but we received an error (maybe
it's not so important): cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/surf mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/surf/lh.fsaverage.ROI5.mgh --in lh.thickness.fsaverage.mgh --sum segstats-ROI5.txt
Loading /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/fsaverage/surf/lh.fsaverage.ROI5.mgh Loading lh.thickness.fsaverage.mgh ERROR: dimension mismatch between input volume and seg
We want to determine the statistics only for this mask for the whole group of subjects (qdec, or mri_glmfit). If the mapping of our subjects thickness data was good, what should we do next in order to achieve our goal ?
Thank you.
Best regards, Dr. Alexandru Hanganu ___________________________________ Department of Neurology, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital, Kiel Campus Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, building no. 41 D-24105 Kiel, Germany.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
In order to help us help you, please follow the steps in: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Alexandru Hanganu -
Doug Greve -
Nick Schmansky