Hi!
I've attached 2 pictures of some brain scans on Freesurfer -- is there any way we can fix the huge underinclusion of the gray matter, hopefully without changing the surfaces of the white matter? What should be done with these scans to fix them?
Thanks! Christina
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Douglas N Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
cortical stats reported by asegstats2table use the surfaces, not the cortical segmentation in aseg.mgz doug
On 03/20/2014 05:29 PM, Christina Chen wrote:
Thanks a lot!! I have a follow up question:
We use the command
asegstats2table
to output the subcortical volumes (and other whole brain volumes) to table. If the aseg is incorrect, can we still believe those values?
Thanks, Christina
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Christina if the aseg is incorrect but the surfaces are right, then you don't need to worry about it. This is the reason we typically use the surfaces instead of the aseg for things like brain volume/cortex modeling. cheers Bruce On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Christina Chen wrote: Hi! If the cortical surface outlines are fine, but there is an overinclusion of brain volume during segmentation, how should I fix this? Can we calculate brain volume based on the cortical surface outlines -- if so,how?
Thanks! Christina _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Hi Christina
it's pretty hard to diagnose from just a handful of slices. I also doubt that it's a huge underinclusion - probably if you move click on a point and change to sagittal you'll see it looks less dramatic. In any case, if you upload a dataset we'll take a look. Alternatively you can try the expert options to mris_make_surfaces to constrain the range of allowable intensities outside the pial surface.
cheers Bruce On Mon, 12 May 2014, Christina Chen wrote:
Hi! I've attached 2 pictures of some brain scans on Freesurfer -- is there any way we can fix the huge underinclusion of the gray matter, hopefully without changing the surfaces of the white matter? What should be done with these scans to fix them?
Thanks! Christina
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Douglas N Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
cortical stats reported by asegstats2table use the surfaces, not the cortical segmentation in aseg.mgz doug On 03/20/2014 05:29 PM, Christina Chen wrote: > Thanks a lot!! I have a follow up question: > > We use the command > > asegstats2table > > to output the subcortical volumes (and other whole brain volumes) to > table. If the aseg is incorrect, can we still believe those values? > > Thanks, > Christina > > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Bruce Fischl<fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Christina
if the aseg is incorrect but the surfaces are right, then you don't need to worry about it. This is the reason we typically use the surfaces instead of the aseg for things like brain volume/cortex modeling.
cheers Bruce
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Christina Chen wrote:
Hi! If the cortical surface outlines are fine, but there is an overinclusion of brain volume during segmentation, how should I fix this? Can we calculate brain volume based on the cortical surface outlines -- if so, how?
Thanks! Christina
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu