Hi there, First the simple question - is there a way to run mris_anatomical_stats on all my subjects at once generating a single output file?
Second - actually comprised from several questions: when looking a the unthresholded group analysis on cortical thickness (in the averaged space), the distribution of negative and positive z values is not necessarily normal. i.e., the range of negative values maybe be 0 to -5, and the range of positive values 0 to +3. 1. Is it legitimate toconclude from this that the regressor's overall effect is that it's associated with a thinner cortex (e.g., older subjects have a thinner cortex), eventhough most of the cortex does not survive FDR or multiple comparison correction? 2. If yes, is there a way of exporting the distribution, or getting some numerical representation of the negative and positive values across the cortex, or within aparc annotations. 3. Is there a way to set FDR separately for positive and negative values?
thanks ilana
Ilana Hairston hairstonster@gmail.com ************************* Our ignorance is not so vast as our failure to use what we know. —M. King Hubbert, peak oil prophet
Hi Ilana,
I'll let the first question to the FS experts to answer. For the second:
- Is it legitimate toconclude from this that the regressor's overall effect is that it's associated with a thinner cortex (e.g., older subjects have a thinner cortex), eventhough most of the cortex does not survive FDR or multiple comparison correction?
Even if the effect exists, your experiment wasn't able to detect it as significant, since nothing survived the multiple testing correction you used. Most scientific journals wouldn't accept conclusions based on non-significant results, despite how compelling the hypothesis might be.
- If yes, is there a way of exporting the distribution, or getting some numerical representation of the negative and positive values across the cortex, or within aparc annotations.
The p-values are in the files sig.mgh, in subdirectories of the qdec directory where the results of the analyses were stored. There are multiple ways to open and a suggestion is to convert to ASCII using the -c option of mris_convert, then open in Octave/Matlab with dlmread.
- Is there a way to set FDR separately for positive and negative values?
The plain answer is no, because for the FDR procedure to work, it's necessary that the p-values under the null are uniformly distributed between 0 and 1 (from the definition of p-values). If you drop part of your distribution, then the p-values are no longer distributed like that. It turns out, however, that in some particular cases, part of the distribution does not actually exist (see Self & Liang, J Am. Stat Assoc, 1987 for some cases, particularly the Cases 5 and 7). A workaround is to divide the q by a constant that depends on the fraction of the distribution that known to be missing (e.g., for Case 5, instead of q=0.05, one could use q=0.025 to obtain the same 5% of false discoveries). However, these particular cases I believe don't apply to your scenario, so please, refrain from applying FDR separately only on positives or negatives.
There is also a second reason for not applying FDR separately: for each set (positive and negative), the number of tests would be reduced, on average, by half, alleviating the multiple testing problem and making, on average, twice as easy for results to survive the threshold, inflating the amount of false discoveries, something undesired.
Hope this helps!
All the best,
Anderson
On 05/16/2011 09:53 AM, Ilana Hairston wrote:
Hi there, First the simple question - is there a way to run mris_anatomical_stats on all my subjects at once generating a single output file?
Second - actually comprised from several questions: when looking a the unthresholded group analysis on cortical thickness (in the averaged space), the distribution of negative and positive z values is not necessarily normal. i.e., the range of negative values maybe be 0 to -5, and the range of positive values 0 to +3.
- Is it legitimate toconclude from this that the regressor's overall effect is that it's associated with a thinner cortex (e.g., older subjects have a thinner cortex), eventhough most of the cortex does not survive FDR or multiple comparison correction?
- If yes, is there a way of exporting the distribution, or getting some numerical representation of the negative and positive values across the cortex, or within aparc annotations.
- Is there a way to set FDR separately for positive and negative values?
thanks ilana
Ilana Hairston hairstonster@gmail.com
Our ignorance is not so vast as our failure to use what we know. —M. King Hubbert, peak oil prophet
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu