No, sorry. You might be able to treat two consecutive trials as a single trial, but then you won't get jitter between them. doug

On 12/10/2013 02:38 PM, Chris McNorgan wrote:

Hi all,

I posed a question back in November but got no replies, so I'll try to restate it briefly:

Is there a means of enforcing at least one set of consecutive trials for a condition in an optseq schedule (or even consecutive trials with an intervening NULL event)?

I am trying to produce a schedule for a 1-back task, and consecutive events for a given condition will only appear by chance. Getting at least one set of consecutive trials for each of 8 conditions has proven exceedingly difficult.

Thanks, Chris _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer