Hi all, I am wondering if partial volume is taken into account when calculating average uptake values of pet data. I know that aseg.stats takes partial volume into account and I am wondering if there is something similar in place for pet data? From what I gather, most people when using FreeSurfer correct for partial volume effects by regressing out cortical thickness, but no basis for this correction method has been provided. Any insight would be appreciated.
n.b. to obtain the pet uptake values I used mri_segstats --seg mri/aparc+aseg.mgz --sum pet.segstats.dat --i $petanat --ctab rois.txt
Thank you, Corinna
Hi Corinna, try adding --pv mri/norm.mgz doug
corinna bauer wrote:
Hi all, I am wondering if partial volume is taken into account when calculating average uptake values of pet data. I know that aseg.stats takes partial volume into account and I am wondering if there is something similar in place for pet data? From what I gather, most people when using FreeSurfer correct for partial volume effects by regressing out cortical thickness, but no basis for this correction method has been provided. Any insight would be appreciated.
n.b. to obtain the pet uptake values I used mri_segstats --seg mri/aparc+aseg.mgz --sum pet.segstats.dat --i $petanat --ctab rois.txt
Thank you, Corinna
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
corinna bauer -
Douglas N Greve