Dear Freesurfers,
I am performing a GLM analysis on two groups (patients versus controls) and one variable (age).
We are using the following option to correct for multiple comparisons:
mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir ${glm_dir}/${hemi}_contrast-${contrast}_${surfname_t1} --cache 1.3 pos/abs
Is it normal to have those 2 different results when using pos or abs option? (see screenshots)
Thank you!
Vale
It is certainly possible. Are some of the clusters in abs negative? Also, I would strongly recommend using permutation if you are using such a low clusterwise threshold. See https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/MultipleComparisonsV6.0... The monte carlo simulation is not valid at such low thresholds
On 2/14/19 11:50 AM, Barletta, Valeria wrote:
Dear Freesurfers,
I am performing a GLM analysis on two groups (patients versus controls) and one variable (age).
We are using the following option to correct for multiple comparisons:
mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir ${glm_dir}/${hemi}_contrast-${contrast}_${surfname_t1} --cache 1.3 pos/abs
Is it normal to have those 2 different results when using pos or abs option? (see screenshots)
Thank you!
Vale
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
There are no negative clusters in abs.
I tried to apply the permutation but it says it requires an orthogonal matrix.
Right now I am using this:
-1 1 0 0
How would my orthogonal matrix look like?
Thanks,
Vale
________________________________ From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. DGREVE@mgh.harvard.edu Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 12:14:27 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] GLM - correction for multiple comparisons
It is certainly possible. Are some of the clusters in abs negative? Also, I would strongly recommend using permutation if you are using such a low clusterwise threshold. See https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/MultipleComparisonsV6.0... The monte carlo simulation is not valid at such low thresholds
On 2/14/19 11:50 AM, Barletta, Valeria wrote:
Dear Freesurfers,
I am performing a GLM analysis on two groups (patients versus controls) and one variable (age).
We are using the following option to correct for multiple comparisons:
mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir ${glm_dir}/${hemi}_contrast-${contrast}_${surfname_t1} --cache 1.3 pos/abs
Is it normal to have those 2 different results when using pos or abs option? (see screenshots)
Thank you!
Vale
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu