Dear FreeSurfer expert,
I have compared the aseg volume between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 with asegstatsdiff from FreeSurfer 6.0 for each subject in my data set. I have enclosed the range for some of the volume. I found the largest differences in subcortical structures, especially in Corpus callosum(CC). I found that FreeSurfer 6.0 CC posterior volume was 525.51 % larger than in FreeSurfer 5.3. Nevertheless, these differences were much smaller for lhCortex, but also here FreeSurfer 6.0 was on average larger than FreeSurfer 5.3. I ran the FreeSurfer 6.0 using the same option as FreeSurfer 5.30. Both versions of FreeSurfer were run on Centos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes.
Best regards
Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD
NTNU
Left-Lateral-Ventricle
7.4 (-0.13,130.72)
Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter
0.64 (-22.9,56.15)
Left-Cerebellum-Cortex
7.56 (-10.3,19.17)
Left-Thalamus-Proper
0.12 (-16.31,32.42)
Left-Caudate
-4.25 (-12,33.64)
Left-Putamen
-16.72 (-27.99,8.3)
Left-Pallidum
16.23 (-22.94,84.75)
Left-Hippocampus
-1.74 (-13.53,15.93)
Left-Amygdala
2.29 (-19.28,41.04)
Right-Lateral-Ventricle
4.6 (-24.77,102.12)
Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter
-3.2 (-20.87,49.37)
Right-Cerebellum-Cortex
4.88 (-12.99,14.36)
Right-Thalamus-Proper
1.06 (-22.34,19.99)
Right-Caudate
-6.08 (-14.59,6.13)
Right-Putamen
-12.87 (-31.37,10.17)
Right-Pallidum
14.01 (-27.79,89.19)
Right-Hippocampus
-1.71 (-9.29,12.02)
Right-Amygdala
3.74 (-18.6,51.01)
Right-Accumbens-area
-9.14 (-37.89,61.02)
CC_Posterior
22.07 (-47.04,525.51)
CC_Mid_Posterior
53.59 (-11.3,537.3)
CC_Central
36.77 (-21.36,317.24)
CC_Mid_Anterior
24.09 (-18.86,128.31)
CC_Anterior
10.64 (-33.71,152.33)
lhCortexVol
3.13 (-1.31,12.37)
rhCortexVol
3.16 (-0.36,14.2)
CortexVol
3 (-4.47,13.26)
EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol
0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
When I ran Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 I ran with default settings using this command. recon-all -s (id) -all for both Freesurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0. Are these differences larger than one would expect? I think that 100% may be a little high? The difference in volume between Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 is shown in the table below calculated using asegstatsdiff.
Knut Jørgen Bjuland
Volume name
Mean(range)
Left-Lateral-Ventricle
7.4 (-0.13,130.72)
Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter
0.64 (-22.9,56.15)
Left-Cerebellum-Cortex
7.56 (-10.3,19.17)
Left-Thalamus-Proper
0.12 (-16.31,32.42)
Left-Caudate
-4.25 (-12,33.64)
Left-Putamen
-16.72 (-27.99,8.3)
Left-Pallidum
16.23 (-22.94,84.75)
Left-Hippocampus
-1.74 (-13.53,15.93)
Left-Amygdala
2.29 (-19.28,41.04)
Right-Lateral-Ventricle
4.6 (-24.77,102.12)
Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter
-3.2 (-20.87,49.37)
Right-Cerebellum-Cortex
4.88 (-12.99,14.36)
Right-Thalamus-Proper
1.06 (-22.34,19.99)
Right-Caudate
-6.08 (-14.59,6.13)
Right-Putamen
-12.87 (-31.37,10.17)
Right-Pallidum
14.01 (-27.79,89.19)
Right-Hippocampus
-1.71 (-9.29,12.02)
Right-Amygdala
3.74 (-18.6,51.01)
Right-Accumbens-area
-9.14 (-37.89,61.02)
CC_Posterior
22.07 (-47.04,525.51)
CC_Mid_Posterior
53.59 (-11.3,537.3)
CC_Central
36.77 (-21.36,317.24)
CC_Mid_Anterior
24.09 (-18.86,128.31)
CC_Anterior
10.64 (-33.71,152.33)
lhCortexVol
3.13 (-1.31,12.37)
rhCortexVol
3.16 (-0.36,14.2)
CortexVol
3 (-4.47,13.26)
EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol
0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
On 21 Apr 2017, at 20:01, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.commailto:knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote:
Dear FreeSurfer expert,
I have compared the aseg volume between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 with asegstatsdiff from FreeSurfer 6.0 for each subject in my data set. I have enclosed the range for some of the volume. I found the largest differences in subcortical structures, especially in Corpus callosum(CC). I found that FreeSurfer 6.0 CC posterior volume was 525.51 % larger than in FreeSurfer 5.3. Nevertheless, these differences were much smaller for lhCortex, but also here FreeSurfer 6.0 was on average larger than FreeSurfer 5.3. I ran the FreeSurfer 6.0 using the same option as FreeSurfer 5.30. Both versions of FreeSurfer were run on Centos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes.
Best regards Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD NTNU
Left-Lateral-Ventricle
7.4 (-0.13,130.72)
Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter
0.64 (-22.9,56.15)
Left-Cerebellum-Cortex
7.56 (-10.3,19.17)
Left-Thalamus-Proper
0.12 (-16.31,32.42)
Left-Caudate
-4.25 (-12,33.64)
Left-Putamen
-16.72 (-27.99,8.3)
Left-Pallidum
16.23 (-22.94,84.75)
Left-Hippocampus
-1.74 (-13.53,15.93)
Left-Amygdala
2.29 (-19.28,41.04)
Right-Lateral-Ventricle
4.6 (-24.77,102.12)
Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter
-3.2 (-20.87,49.37)
Right-Cerebellum-Cortex
4.88 (-12.99,14.36)
Right-Thalamus-Proper
1.06 (-22.34,19.99)
Right-Caudate
-6.08 (-14.59,6.13)
Right-Putamen
-12.87 (-31.37,10.17)
Right-Pallidum
14.01 (-27.79,89.19)
Right-Hippocampus
-1.71 (-9.29,12.02)
Right-Amygdala
3.74 (-18.6,51.01)
Right-Accumbens-area
-9.14 (-37.89,61.02)
CC_Posterior
22.07 (-47.04,525.51)
CC_Mid_Posterior
53.59 (-11.3,537.3)
CC_Central
36.77 (-21.36,317.24)
CC_Mid_Anterior
24.09 (-18.86,128.31)
CC_Anterior
10.64 (-33.71,152.33)
lhCortexVol
3.13 (-1.31,12.37)
rhCortexVol
3.16 (-0.36,14.2)
CortexVol
3 (-4.47,13.26)
EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol
0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi Knut
I didn't see a 100% below. They look like what we usually see - low contrast small structures (e.g. the pallidum) or ones with poorly definied boundaries (the segments of the callosum, also quite small) show large % changes (which typically correspond to not very many voxels).
cheers Bruce
On Tue, 2 May 2017, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
Dear FreeSurfer experts, When I ran Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 I ran with default settings us ing this command. recon-all -s (id) -all for both Freesurfer 5.3 and FreeSu rfer 6.0. Are these differences larger than one would expect? I think that 100% may b e a little high? The difference in volume between Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesu rfer 6.0 is shown in the table below calculated using asegstatsdiff. Knut Jørgen Bjuland
Volume name
Mean(range)
Left-Lateral-Ventricle
7.4 (-0.13,130.72)
Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter
0.64 (-22.9,56.15)
Left-Cerebellum-Cortex
7.56 (-10.3,19.17)
Left-Thalamus-Proper
0.12 (-16.31,32.42)
Left-Caudate
-4.25 (-12,33.64)
Left-Putamen
-16.72 (-27.99,8.3)
Left-Pallidum
16.23 (-22.94,84.75)
Left-Hippocampus
-1.74 (-13.53,15.93)
Left-Amygdala
2.29 (-19.28,41.04)
Right-Lateral-Ventricle
4.6 (-24.77,102.12)
Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter
-3.2 (-20.87,49.37)
Right-Cerebellum-Cortex
4.88 (-12.99,14.36)
Right-Thalamus-Proper
1.06 (-22.34,19.99)
Right-Caudate
-6.08 (-14.59,6.13)
Right-Putamen
-12.87 (-31.37,10.17)
Right-Pallidum
14.01 (-27.79,89.19)
Right-Hippocampus
-1.71 (-9.29,12.02)
Right-Amygdala
3.74 (-18.6,51.01)
Right-Accumbens-area
-9.14 (-37.89,61.02)
CC_Posterior
22.07 (-47.04,525.51)
CC_Mid_Posterior
53.59 (-11.3,537.3)
CC_Central
36.77 (-21.36,317.24)
CC_Mid_Anterior
24.09 (-18.86,128.31)
CC_Anterior
10.64 (-33.71,152.33)
lhCortexVol
3.13 (-1.31,12.37)
rhCortexVol
3.16 (-0.36,14.2)
CortexVol
3 (-4.47,13.26)
EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol
0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
On 21 Apr 2017, at 20:01, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote:Dear FreeSurfer expert, I have compared the aseg volume between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 w ith asegstatsdiff from FreeSurfer 6.0 for each subject in my data set. I ha ve enclosed the range for some of the volume. I found the largest differenc es in subcortical structures, especially in Corpus callosum(CC). I found th at FreeSurfer 6.0 CC posterior volume was 525.51 % larger than in FreeSurfe r 5.3. Nevertheless, these differences were much smaller for lhCortex, but
?? ?also here FreeSurfer 6.0 was on average larger than FreeSurfer 5.3. I ran t
he FreeSurfer 6.0 using the same option as FreeSurfer 5.30. Both versions o f FreeSurfer were run on Centos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes.
Best regards Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD NTNU
Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline%C2%A0. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
This is a test we do before we release. The averages don't look out of line. Putamen should be smaller because we now try to remove claustrum. Small structures may have some large percent differences. Some structures are not that meaningful (like the CC because it has no real boundaries). The left lateral ventricle may be a problem. I've seen cases where it totally gets filled in with WM in v6. Others are hard to define -- when I would look at the scans there would not be a good case for rejecting one and accepting the other (eg, pallidum and thalamus don't have good contrast at typical mprage acq parameters).
On 5/2/17 3:56 AM, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
When I ran Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 I ran with default settings using this command. recon-all -s (id) -all for both Freesurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0. Are these differences larger than one would expect? I think that 100% may be a little high? The difference in volume between Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 is shown in the table below calculated using asegstatsdiff.
Knut Jørgen Bjuland
Volume name
Mean(range)
Left-Lateral-Ventricle
7.4 (-0.13,130.72)
Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter
0.64 (-22.9,56.15)
Left-Cerebellum-Cortex
7.56 (-10.3,19.17)
Left-Thalamus-Proper
0.12 (-16.31,32.42)
Left-Caudate
-4.25 (-12,33.64)
Left-Putamen
-16.72 (-27.99,8.3)
Left-Pallidum
16.23 (-22.94,84.75)
Left-Hippocampus
-1.74 (-13.53,15.93)
Left-Amygdala
2.29 (-19.28,41.04)
Right-Lateral-Ventricle
4.6 (-24.77,102.12)
Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter
-3.2 (-20.87,49.37)
Right-Cerebellum-Cortex
4.88 (-12.99,14.36)
Right-Thalamus-Proper
1.06 (-22.34,19.99)
Right-Caudate
-6.08 (-14.59,6.13)
Right-Putamen
-12.87 (-31.37,10.17)
Right-Pallidum
14.01 (-27.79,89.19)
Right-Hippocampus
-1.71 (-9.29,12.02)
Right-Amygdala
3.74 (-18.6,51.01)
Right-Accumbens-area
-9.14 (-37.89,61.02)
CC_Posterior
22.07 (-47.04,525.51)
CC_Mid_Posterior
53.59 (-11.3,537.3)
CC_Central
36.77 (-21.36,317.24)
CC_Mid_Anterior
24.09 (-18.86,128.31)
CC_Anterior
10.64 (-33.71,152.33)
lhCortexVol
3.13 (-1.31,12.37)
rhCortexVol
3.16 (-0.36,14.2)
CortexVol
3 (-4.47,13.26)
EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol
0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
On 21 Apr 2017, at 20:01, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.com mailto:knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote:
DearFreeSurferexpert, IhavecomparedtheasegvolumebetweenFreeSurfer5.3andFreeSurfer6.0withasegstatsdifffromFreeSurfer6.0foreachsubjectinmydataset.Ihaveenclosedtherangeforsomeofthevolume.Ifoundthelargestdifferencesinsubcorticalstructures,especiallyinCorpuscallosum(CC).IfoundthatFreeSurfer6.0CCposteriorvolumewas525.51%largerthaninFreeSurfer5.3.Nevertheless,thesedifferencesweremuchsmallerforlhCortex,butalsohereFreeSurfer6.0wasonaveragelargerthanFreeSurfer5.3.IrantheFreeSurfer6.0usingthesameoptionasFreeSurfer5.30.BothversionsofFreeSurferwererunonCentos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes.
Best regards Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD NTNU
Left-Lateral-Ventricle
7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter
0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex
7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper
0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate
-4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen
-16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum
16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus
-1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala
2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle
4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter
-3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex
4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper
1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate
-6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen
-12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum
14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus
-1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala
3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area
-9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior
22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior
53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central
36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior
24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior
10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol
3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol
3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol
3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol
0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Hi
Are there any options that I can use in Freesurfer 6.0 that can prevent left lateral ventricle from being filled with WM? Should I send the MPRAGE sequence information?
Knut Jørgen
On 2 May 2017, at 17:57, Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
This is a test we do before we release. The averages don't look out of line. Putamen should be smaller because we now try to remove claustrum. Small structures may have some large percent differences. Some structures are not that meaningful (like the CC because it has no real boundaries). The left lateral ventricle may be a problem. I've seen cases where it totally gets filled in with WM in v6. Others are hard to define -- when I would look at the scans there would not be a good case for rejecting one and accepting the other (eg, pallidum and thalamus don't have good contrast at typical mprage acq parameters).
On 5/2/17 3:56 AM, Knut J Bjuland wrote: Dear FreeSurfer experts,
When I ran Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 I ran with default settings using this command. recon-all -s (id) -all for both Freesurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0. Are these differences larger than one would expect? I think that 100% may be a little high? The difference in volume between Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 is shown in the table below calculated using asegstatsdiff.
Knut Jørgen Bjuland
Volume name
Mean(range)
Left-Lateral-Ventricle
7.4 (-0.13,130.72)
Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter
0.64 (-22.9,56.15)
Left-Cerebellum-Cortex
7.56 (-10.3,19.17)
Left-Thalamus-Proper
0.12 (-16.31,32.42)
Left-Caudate
-4.25 (-12,33.64)
Left-Putamen
-16.72 (-27.99,8.3)
Left-Pallidum
16.23 (-22.94,84.75)
Left-Hippocampus
-1.74 (-13.53,15.93)
Left-Amygdala
2.29 (-19.28,41.04)
Right-Lateral-Ventricle
4.6 (-24.77,102.12)
Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter
-3.2 (-20.87,49.37)
Right-Cerebellum-Cortex
4.88 (-12.99,14.36)
Right-Thalamus-Proper
1.06 (-22.34,19.99)
Right-Caudate
-6.08 (-14.59,6.13)
Right-Putamen
-12.87 (-31.37,10.17)
Right-Pallidum
14.01 (-27.79,89.19)
Right-Hippocampus
-1.71 (-9.29,12.02)
Right-Amygdala
3.74 (-18.6,51.01)
Right-Accumbens-area
-9.14 (-37.89,61.02)
CC_Posterior
22.07 (-47.04,525.51)
CC_Mid_Posterior
53.59 (-11.3,537.3)
CC_Central
36.77 (-21.36,317.24)
CC_Mid_Anterior
24.09 (-18.86,128.31)
CC_Anterior
10.64 (-33.71,152.33)
lhCortexVol
3.13 (-1.31,12.37)
rhCortexVol
3.16 (-0.36,14.2)
CortexVol
3 (-4.47,13.26)
EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol
0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
On 21 Apr 2017, at 20:01, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.commailto:knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote:
Dear FreeSurfer expert,
I have compared the aseg volume between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 with asegstatsdiff from FreeSurfer 6.0 for each subject in my data set. I have enclosed the range for some of the volume. I found the largest differences in subcortical structures, especially in Corpus callosum(CC). I found that FreeSurfer 6.0 CC posterior volume was 525.51 % larger than in FreeSurfer 5.3. Nevertheless, these differences were much smaller for lhCortex, but also here FreeSurfer 6.0 was on average larger than FreeSurfer 5.3. I ran the FreeSurfer 6.0 using the same option as FreeSurfer 5.30. Both versions of FreeSurfer were run on Centos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes.
Best regards Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD NTNU
Left-Lateral-Ventricle
7.4 (-0.13,130.72)
Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter
0.64 (-22.9,56.15)
Left-Cerebellum-Cortex
7.56 (-10.3,19.17)
Left-Thalamus-Proper
0.12 (-16.31,32.42)
Left-Caudate
-4.25 (-12,33.64)
Left-Putamen
-16.72 (-27.99,8.3)
Left-Pallidum
16.23 (-22.94,84.75)
Left-Hippocampus
-1.74 (-13.53,15.93)
Left-Amygdala
2.29 (-19.28,41.04)
Right-Lateral-Ventricle
4.6 (-24.77,102.12)
Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter
-3.2 (-20.87,49.37)
Right-Cerebellum-Cortex
4.88 (-12.99,14.36)
Right-Thalamus-Proper
1.06 (-22.34,19.99)
Right-Caudate
-6.08 (-14.59,6.13)
Right-Putamen
-12.87 (-31.37,10.17)
Right-Pallidum
14.01 (-27.79,89.19)
Right-Hippocampus
-1.71 (-9.29,12.02)
Right-Amygdala
3.74 (-18.6,51.01)
Right-Accumbens-area
-9.14 (-37.89,61.02)
CC_Posterior
22.07 (-47.04,525.51)
CC_Mid_Posterior
53.59 (-11.3,537.3)
CC_Central
36.77 (-21.36,317.24)
CC_Mid_Anterior
24.09 (-18.86,128.31)
CC_Anterior
10.64 (-33.71,152.33)
lhCortexVol
3.13 (-1.31,12.37)
rhCortexVol
3.16 (-0.36,14.2)
CortexVol
3 (-4.47,13.26)
EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol
0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi Knut
where is it being filled? If it is the occipital horn we may soon have a patch for it
cheers Bruce On Thu, 4 May 2017, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
Hi
Are there any options that I can use in Freesurfer 6.0 that can prevent lef t lateral ventricle from being filled with WM? Should I send the MPRAGE seq uence information?
Knut Jørgen
On 2 May 2017, at 17:57, Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:This is a test we do before we release. The averages don't look out of line. Putamen should be smaller because we now try to remove claustrum. Small structures may have some large percent differences. Some structures are not that meaningful (like the CC because it has no real boundaries). The left lateral ventricle may be a problem. I've seen cases where it totally gets filled in with WM in v6. Others are hard to define -- when I would look at the scans there would not be a good case for rejecting one and accepting the other (eg, pallidum and thalamus don't have good contrast at typical mprage acq parameters).
On 5/2/17 3:56 AM, Knut J Bjuland wrote: Dear FreeSurfer experts, When I ran Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 I ran with default settings us ing this command. recon-all -s (id) -all for both Freesurfer 5.3 and FreeSu rfer 6.0. Are these differences larger than one would expect? I think that 100% may b e a little high? The difference in volume between Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesu rfer 6.0 is shown in the table below calculated using asegstatsdiff. Knut Jørgen Bjuland
Volume name
Mean(range)
Left-Lateral-Ventricle
7.4 (-0.13,130.72)
Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter
0.64 (-22.9,56.15)
Left-Cerebellum-Cortex
7.56 (-10.3,19.17)
Left-Thalamus-Proper
0.12 (-16.31,32.42)
Left-Caudate
-4.25 (-12,33.64)
Left-Putamen
-16.72 (-27.99,8.3)
Left-Pallidum
16.23 (-22.94,84.75)
Left-Hippocampus
-1.74 (-13.53,15.93)
Left-Amygdala
2.29 (-19.28,41.04)
Right-Lateral-Ventricle
4.6 (-24.77,102.12)
Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter
-3.2 (-20.87,49.37)
Right-Cerebellum-Cortex
4.88 (-12.99,14.36)
Right-Thalamus-Proper
1.06 (-22.34,19.99)
Right-Caudate
-6.08 (-14.59,6.13)
Right-Putamen
-12.87 (-31.37,10.17)
Right-Pallidum
14.01 (-27.79,89.19)
Right-Hippocampus
-1.71 (-9.29,12.02)
Right-Amygdala
3.74 (-18.6,51.01)
Right-Accumbens-area
-9.14 (-37.89,61.02)
CC_Posterior
22.07 (-47.04,525.51)
CC_Mid_Posterior
53.59 (-11.3,537.3)
CC_Central
36.77 (-21.36,317.24)
CC_Mid_Anterior
24.09 (-18.86,128.31)
CC_Anterior
10.64 (-33.71,152.33)
lhCortexVol
3.13 (-1.31,12.37)
rhCortexVol
3.16 (-0.36,14.2)
CortexVol
3 (-4.47,13.26)
EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol
0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
On 21 Apr 2017, at 20:01, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote:Dear FreeSurfer expert, I have compared the aseg volume between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 w ith asegstatsdiff from FreeSurfer 6.0 for each subject in my data set. I ha ve enclosed the range for some of the volume. I found the largest differenc es in subcortical structures, especially in Corpus callosum(CC). I found th at FreeSurfer 6.0 CC posterior volume was 525.51 % larger than in FreeSurfe r 5.3. Nevertheless, these differences were much smaller for lhCortex, but
?? ?also here FreeSurfer 6.0 was on average larger than FreeSurfer 5.3. I ran t
he FreeSurfer 6.0 using the same option as FreeSurfer 5.30. Both versions o f FreeSurfer were run on Centos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes.
Best regards Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD NTNU
Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline%C2%A0. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi Bruce
I found some filled-in occipital horn and some in the anterior parts. I can upload nu.mgz and aseg.mgz for a subject with problems with lateral ventricle.
Cheers Knut Jørgen
On 4 May 2017, at 16:54, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Knut
where is it being filled? If it is the occipital horn we may soon have a patch for it
cheers Bruce On Thu, 4 May 2017, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
Hi Are there any options that I can use in Freesurfer 6.0 that can prevent lef t lateral ventricle from being filled with WM? Should I send the MPRAGE seq uence information? Knut Jørgen
On 2 May 2017, at 17:57, Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: This is a test we do before we release. The averages don't look out of line. Putamen should be smaller because we now try to remove claustrum. Small structures may have some large percent differences. Some structures are not that meaningful (like the CC because it has no real boundaries). The left lateral ventricle may be a problem. I've seen cases where it totally gets filled in with WM in v6. Others are hard to define -- when I would look at the scans there would not be a good case for rejecting one and accepting the other (eg, pallidum and thalamus don't have good contrast at typical mprage acq parameters). On 5/2/17 3:56 AM, Knut J Bjuland wrote: Dear FreeSurfer experts,
When I ran Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 I ran with default settings us ing this command. recon-all -s (id) -all for both Freesurfer 5.3 and FreeSu rfer 6.0. Are these differences larger than one would expect? I think that 100% may b e a little high? The difference in volume between Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesu rfer 6.0 is shown in the table below calculated using asegstatsdiff.
Knut Jørgen Bjuland Volume name Mean(range) Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
On 21 Apr 2017, at 20:01, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.commailto:knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote: Dear FreeSurfer expert,
I have compared the aseg volume between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 w ith asegstatsdiff from FreeSurfer 6.0 for each subject in my data set. I ha ve enclosed the range for some of the volume. I found the largest differenc es in subcortical structures, especially in Corpus callosum(CC). I found th at FreeSurfer 6.0 CC posterior volume was 525.51 % larger than in FreeSurfe r 5.3. Nevertheless, these differences were much smaller for lhCortex, but ?? ?also here FreeSurfer 6.0 was on average larger than FreeSurfer 5.3. I ran t he FreeSurfer 6.0 using the same option as FreeSurfer 5.30. Both versions o f FreeSurfer were run on Centos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes.
Best regards Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD NTNU Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52) _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Include the orig.mgz and voxel cords and I'll see if I have already fixed it
On May 5, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Knut J Bjuland knutjorgen@outlook.com wrote:
Hi Bruce
I found some filled-in occipital horn and some in the anterior parts. I can upload nu.mgz and aseg.mgz for a subject with problems with lateral ventricle.
Cheers Knut Jørgen
On 4 May 2017, at 16:54, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Knut
where is it being filled? If it is the occipital horn we may soon have a patch for it
cheers Bruce On Thu, 4 May 2017, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
Hi Are there any options that I can use in Freesurfer 6.0 that can prevent lef t lateral ventricle from being filled with WM? Should I send the MPRAGE seq uence information? Knut Jørgen
On 2 May 2017, at 17:57, Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:This is a test we do before we release. The averages don't look out of line. Putamen should be smaller because we now try to remove claustrum. Small structures may have some large percent differences. Some structures are not that meaningful (like the CC because it has no real boundaries). The left lateral ventricle may be a problem. I've seen cases where it totally gets filled in with WM in v6. Others are hard to define -- when I would look at the scans there would not be a good case for rejecting one and accepting the other (eg, pallidum and thalamus don't have good contrast at typical mprage acq parameters). On 5/2/17 3:56 AM, Knut J Bjuland wrote: Dear FreeSurfer experts,
When I ran Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 I ran with default settings us ing this command. recon-all -s (id) -all for both Freesurfer 5.3 and FreeSu rfer 6.0. Are these differences larger than one would expect? I think that 100% may b e a little high? The difference in volume between Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesu rfer 6.0 is shown in the table below calculated using asegstatsdiff.
Knut Jørgen Bjuland Volume name Mean(range) Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
On 21 Apr 2017, at 20:01, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote:Dear FreeSurfer expert,
I have compared the aseg volume between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 w ith asegstatsdiff from FreeSurfer 6.0 for each subject in my data set. I ha ve enclosed the range for some of the volume. I found the largest differenc es in subcortical structures, especially in Corpus callosum(CC). I found th at FreeSurfer 6.0 CC posterior volume was 525.51 % larger than in FreeSurfe r 5.3. Nevertheless, these differences were much smaller for lhCortex, but
?? ?also here FreeSurfer 6.0 was on average larger than FreeSurfer 5.3. I ran t
he FreeSurfer 6.0 using the same option as FreeSurfer 5.30. Both versions o f FreeSurfer were run on Centos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes.
Best regards Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD NTNU Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52) _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Hi Bruce
Where should I upload orig.mgz, nu.mgz, aseg.mgz and voxel cords?
Knut Jørgen ________________________________ From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 4:44:49 PM To: Freesurfer support list Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Differences in aseg volumes between FreeSurfer 5.3.0 and FreeSurfer 6.0
Include the orig.mgz and voxel cords and I'll see if I have already fixed it
On May 5, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.commailto:knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote:
Hi Bruce
I found some filled-in occipital horn and some in the anterior parts. I can upload nu.mgz and aseg.mgz for a subject with problems with lateral ventricle.
Cheers Knut Jørgen
On 4 May 2017, at 16:54, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Knut
where is it being filled? If it is the occipital horn we may soon have a patch for it
cheers Bruce On Thu, 4 May 2017, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
Hi Are there any options that I can use in Freesurfer 6.0 that can prevent lef t lateral ventricle from being filled with WM? Should I send the MPRAGE seq uence information? Knut Jørgen
On 2 May 2017, at 17:57, Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: This is a test we do before we release. The averages don't look out of line. Putamen should be smaller because we now try to remove claustrum. Small structures may have some large percent differences. Some structures are not that meaningful (like the CC because it has no real boundaries). The left lateral ventricle may be a problem. I've seen cases where it totally gets filled in with WM in v6. Others are hard to define -- when I would look at the scans there would not be a good case for rejecting one and accepting the other (eg, pallidum and thalamus don't have good contrast at typical mprage acq parameters). On 5/2/17 3:56 AM, Knut J Bjuland wrote: Dear FreeSurfer experts,
When I ran Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 I ran with default settings us ing this command. recon-all -s (id) -all for both Freesurfer 5.3 and FreeSu rfer 6.0. Are these differences larger than one would expect? I think that 100% may b e a little high? The difference in volume between Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesu rfer 6.0 is shown in the table below calculated using asegstatsdiff.
Knut Jørgen Bjuland Volume name Mean(range) Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
On 21 Apr 2017, at 20:01, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.commailto:knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote: Dear FreeSurfer expert,
I have compared the aseg volume between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 w ith asegstatsdiff from FreeSurfer 6.0 for each subject in my data set. I ha ve enclosed the range for some of the volume. I found the largest differenc es in subcortical structures, especially in Corpus callosum(CC). I found th at FreeSurfer 6.0 CC posterior volume was 525.51 % larger than in FreeSurfe r 5.3. Nevertheless, these differences were much smaller for lhCortex, but ?? ?also here FreeSurfer 6.0 was on average larger than FreeSurfer 5.3. I ran t he FreeSurfer 6.0 using the same option as FreeSurfer 5.30. Both versions o f FreeSurfer were run on Centos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes.
Best regards Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD NTNU Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52) _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Hi Knut
the best would be if you can just tar and gzip the entire subject dir and upload it according to these dirs:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FtpFileExchange
cheers Bruce On Sat, 6 May 2017, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
Hi Bruce Where should I upload orig.mgz, nu.mgz, aseg.mgz and voxel cords?
Knut Jørgen
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 4:44:49 PM To: Freesurfer support list Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Differences in aseg volumes between FreeSurfer 5.3.0 and FreeSurfer 6.0 Include the orig.mgz and voxel cords and I'll see if I have already fixed it
On May 5, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Knut J Bjuland knutjorgen@outlook.com wrote:
Hi BruceI found some filled-in occipital horn and some in the anterior parts. I can upload nu.mgz and aseg.mgz for a subject with problems with lateral ventri cle.
Cheers Knut Jørgen
On 4 May 2017, at 16:54, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:Hi Knut
where is it being filled? If it is the occipital horn we may soon have a patch for it
cheers Bruce On Thu, 4 May 2017, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
HiAre there any options that I can use in Freesurfer 6.0 that can prevent lef
t lateral ventricle from being filled with WM? Should I send the MPRAGE seq
uence information? Knut Jørgen On 2 May 2017, at 17:57, Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: This is a test we do before we release. The averages don't look out of line. Putamen should be smaller because we now try to remove claustrum. Small structures may have some large percent differences. Some structures are not that meaningful (like the CC because it has no real boundaries). The left lateral ventricle may be a problem. I've seen cases where it totally gets filled in with WM in v6. Others are hard to define -- when I would look at the scans there would not be a good case for rejecting one and accepting the other (eg, pallidum and thalamus don't have good contrast at typical mprage acq parameters). On 5/2/17 3:56 AM, Knut J Bjuland wrote: Dear FreeSurfer experts,When I ran Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 I ran with default settings us
ing this command. recon-all -s (id) -all for both Freesurfer 5.3 and FreeSu
rfer 6.0.Are these differences larger than one would expect? I think that 100% may b
e a little high? The difference in volume between Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesu
rfer 6.0 is shown in the table below calculated using asegstatsdiff. Knut Jørgen Bjuland Volume name Mean(range) Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52) On 21 Apr 2017, at 20:01, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote: Dear FreeSurfer expert,I have compared the aseg volume between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 w
ith asegstatsdiff from FreeSurfer 6.0 for each subject in my data set. I ha
ve enclosed the range for some of the volume. I found the largest differenc
es in subcortical structures, especially in Corpus callosum(CC). I found th
at FreeSurfer 6.0 CC posterior volume was 525.51 % larger than in FreeSurfe
r 5.3. Nevertheless, these differences were much smaller for lhCortex, but???also here FreeSurfer 6.0 was on average larger than FreeSurfer 5.3. I ran
?? ?t
he FreeSurfer 6.0 using the same option as FreeSurfer 5.30. Both versions o
f FreeSurfer were run on Centos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes. Best regards Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD NTNU Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52) _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Hi Bruce
I have uploaded the subject as subject_7.tar.gz and subject_7.zip at transfer/incoming on surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/ I can also upload the same subject where I used fs53.
Thanks Knut Jørgen
On 7 May 2017, at 16:26, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Knut
the best would be if you can just tar and gzip the entire subject dir and upload it according to these dirs:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FtpFileExchange
cheers Bruce On Sat, 6 May 2017, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
Hi Bruce Where should I upload orig.mgz, nu.mgz, aseg.mgz and voxel cords? Knut Jørgen ____________________________________________________________________________ From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 4:44:49 PM To: Freesurfer support list Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Differences in aseg volumes between FreeSurfer 5.3.0 and FreeSurfer 6.0 Include the orig.mgz and voxel cords and I'll see if I have already fixed it On May 5, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Knut J Bjuland knutjorgen@outlook.com wrote:
Hi Bruce I found some filled-in occipital horn and some in the anterior parts. I can upload nu.mgz and aseg.mgz for a subject with problems with lateral ventri cle. Cheers Knut Jørgen
On 4 May 2017, at 16:54, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi Knut where is it being filled? If it is the occipital horn we may soon have a patch for it cheers Bruce On Thu, 4 May 2017, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
Hi Are there any options that I can use in Freesurfer 6.0 that can prevent lef t lateral ventricle from being filled with WM? Should I send the MPRAGE seq
uence information? Knut Jørgen
On 2 May 2017, at 17:57, Douglas Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: This is a test we do before we release. The averages don't look out of line. Putamen should be smaller because we now try to remove claustrum. Small structures may have some large percent differences. Some structures are not that meaningful (like the CC because it has no real boundaries). The left lateral ventricle may be a problem. I've seen cases where it totally gets filled in with WM in v6. Others are hard to define -- when I would look at the scans there would not be a good case for rejecting one and accepting the other (eg, pallidum and thalamus don't have good contrast at typical mprage acq parameters). On 5/2/17 3:56 AM, Knut J Bjuland wrote: Dear FreeSurfer experts,
When I ran Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 I ran with default settings us ing this command. recon-all -s (id) -all for both Freesurfer 5.3 and FreeSu
rfer 6.0. Are these differences larger than one would expect? I think that 100% may b e a little high? The difference in volume between Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesu
rfer 6.0 is shown in the table below calculated using asegstatsdiff.
Knut Jørgen Bjuland Volume name Mean(range) Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
On 21 Apr 2017, at 20:01, Knut J Bjuland knutjorgen@outlook.com wrote: Dear FreeSurfer expert,
I have compared the aseg volume between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 w ith asegstatsdiff from FreeSurfer 6.0 for each subject in my data set. I ha ve enclosed the range for some of the volume. I found the largest differenc es in subcortical structures, especially in Corpus callosum(CC). I found th at FreeSurfer 6.0 CC posterior volume was 525.51 % larger than in FreeSurfe
r 5.3. Nevertheless, these differences were much smaller for lhCortex, but ???also here FreeSurfer 6.0 was on average larger than FreeSurfer 5.3. I ran ?? ?t he FreeSurfer 6.0 using the same option as FreeSurfer 5.30. Both versions o
f FreeSurfer were run on Centos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes.
Best regards Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD NTNU Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52) _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
sure, that would be helpful On Sun, 7 May 2017, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
Hi Bruce
I have uploaded the subject as subject_7.tar.gz and subject_7.zip at transf er/incoming on surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu I can also upload the same subject where I used fs53.
Thanks Knut Jørgen
On 7 May 2017, at 16:26, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:Hi Knut
the best would be if you can just tar and gzip the entire subject dir and upload it according to these dirs:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FtpFileExchange
cheers Bruce On Sat, 6 May 2017, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
Hi Bruce Where should I upload orig.mgz, nu.mgz, aseg.mgz and voxel cords? Knut Jørgen
_ From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 4:44:49 PM To: Freesurfer support list Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Differences in aseg volumes between FreeSurfer 5.3.0 and FreeSurfer 6.0 Include the orig.mgz and voxel cords and I'll see if I have already fixed it On May 5, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote: Hi BruceI found some filled-in occipital horn and some in the anterior parts. I can
upload nu.mgz and aseg.mgz for a subject with problems with lateral ventri
cle. Cheers Knut Jørgen On 4 May 2017, at 16:54, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: Hi Knut where is it being filled? If it is the occipital horn we may soon have a patch for it cheers Bruce On Thu, 4 May 2017, Knut J Bjuland wrote: HiAre there any options that I can use in Freesurfer 6.0 that can prevent lef
t lateral ventricle from being filled with WM? Should I send the MPRAGE seq
uence information? Knut Jørgen On 2 May 2017, at 17:57, Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: This is a test we do before we release. The averages don't look out of line. Putamen should be smaller because we now try to remove claustrum. Small structures may have some large percent differences. Some structures are not that meaningful (like the CC because it has no real boundaries). The left lateral ventricle may be a problem. I've seen cases where it totally gets filled in with WM in v6. Others are hard to define -- when I would look at the scans there would not be a good case for rejecting one and accepting the other (eg, pallidum and thalamus don't have good contrast at typical mprage acq parameters). On 5/2/17 3:56 AM, Knut J Bjuland wrote: Dear FreeSurfer experts,When I ran Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 I ran with default settings us
ing this command. recon-all -s (id) -all for both Freesurfer 5.3 and FreeSu
rfer 6.0.Are these differences larger than one would expect? I think that 100% may b
e a little high? The difference in volume between Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesu
rfer 6.0 is shown in the table below calculated using asegstatsdiff. Knut Jørgen Bjuland Volume name Mean(range) Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52) On 21 Apr 2017, at 20:01, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote: Dear FreeSurfer expert,I have compared the aseg volume between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 w
ith asegstatsdiff from FreeSurfer 6.0 for each subject in my data set. I ha
ve enclosed the range for some of the volume. I found the largest differenc
es in subcortical structures, especially in Corpus callosum(CC). I found th
at FreeSurfer 6.0 CC posterior volume was 525.51 % larger than in FreeSurfe
r 5.3. Nevertheless, these differences were much smaller for lhCortex, but ???also here FreeSurfer 6.0 was on average larger than FreeSurfer 5.3. I ra n
?? ?t he FreeSurfer 6.0 using the same option as FreeSurfer 5.30. Both versions o
f FreeSurfer were run on Centos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes. Best regards Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD NTNU Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52) _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
p.s. did 5.3 do better? Did you try it with -bigventricles? The ventricles on this subject are extremely large. On Sun, 7 May 2017, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
Hi Bruce
I have uploaded the subject as subject_7.tar.gz and subject_7.zip at transf er/incoming on surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu I can also upload the same subject where I used fs53.
Thanks Knut Jørgen
On 7 May 2017, at 16:26, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:Hi Knut
the best would be if you can just tar and gzip the entire subject dir and upload it according to these dirs:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FtpFileExchange
cheers Bruce On Sat, 6 May 2017, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
Hi Bruce Where should I upload orig.mgz, nu.mgz, aseg.mgz and voxel cords? Knut Jørgen
_ From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 4:44:49 PM To: Freesurfer support list Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Differences in aseg volumes between FreeSurfer 5.3.0 and FreeSurfer 6.0 Include the orig.mgz and voxel cords and I'll see if I have already fixed it On May 5, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote: Hi BruceI found some filled-in occipital horn and some in the anterior parts. I can
upload nu.mgz and aseg.mgz for a subject with problems with lateral ventri
cle. Cheers Knut Jørgen On 4 May 2017, at 16:54, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: Hi Knut where is it being filled? If it is the occipital horn we may soon have a patch for it cheers Bruce On Thu, 4 May 2017, Knut J Bjuland wrote: HiAre there any options that I can use in Freesurfer 6.0 that can prevent lef
t lateral ventricle from being filled with WM? Should I send the MPRAGE seq
uence information? Knut Jørgen On 2 May 2017, at 17:57, Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: This is a test we do before we release. The averages don't look out of line. Putamen should be smaller because we now try to remove claustrum. Small structures may have some large percent differences. Some structures are not that meaningful (like the CC because it has no real boundaries). The left lateral ventricle may be a problem. I've seen cases where it totally gets filled in with WM in v6. Others are hard to define -- when I would look at the scans there would not be a good case for rejecting one and accepting the other (eg, pallidum and thalamus don't have good contrast at typical mprage acq parameters). On 5/2/17 3:56 AM, Knut J Bjuland wrote: Dear FreeSurfer experts,When I ran Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 I ran with default settings us
ing this command. recon-all -s (id) -all for both Freesurfer 5.3 and FreeSu
rfer 6.0.Are these differences larger than one would expect? I think that 100% may b
e a little high? The difference in volume between Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesu
rfer 6.0 is shown in the table below calculated using asegstatsdiff. Knut Jørgen Bjuland Volume name Mean(range) Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52) On 21 Apr 2017, at 20:01, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote: Dear FreeSurfer expert,I have compared the aseg volume between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 w
ith asegstatsdiff from FreeSurfer 6.0 for each subject in my data set. I ha
ve enclosed the range for some of the volume. I found the largest differenc
es in subcortical structures, especially in Corpus callosum(CC). I found th
at FreeSurfer 6.0 CC posterior volume was 525.51 % larger than in FreeSurfe
r 5.3. Nevertheless, these differences were much smaller for lhCortex, but ???also here FreeSurfer 6.0 was on average larger than FreeSurfer 5.3. I ra n
?? ?t he FreeSurfer 6.0 using the same option as FreeSurfer 5.30. Both versions o
f FreeSurfer were run on Centos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes. Best regards Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD NTNU Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52) _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi
Are there any options that I can use in Freesurfer 6.0 that can prevent left lateral ventricle from being filled with WM? Should I send the MPRAGE sequence information?
Knut Jørgen
On 2 May 2017, at 17:57, Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
This is a test we do before we release. The averages don't look out of line. Putamen should be smaller because we now try to remove claustrum. Small structures may have some large percent differences. Some structures are not that meaningful (like the CC because it has no real boundaries). The left lateral ventricle may be a problem. I've seen cases where it totally gets filled in with WM in v6. Others are hard to define -- when I would look at the scans there would not be a good case for rejecting one and accepting the other (eg, pallidum and thalamus don't have good contrast at typical mprage acq parameters).
On 5/2/17 3:56 AM, Knut J Bjuland wrote: Dear FreeSurfer experts,
When I ran Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 I ran with default settings using this command. recon-all -s (id) -all for both Freesurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0. Are these differences larger than one would expect? I think that 100% may be a little high? The difference in volume between Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 is shown in the table below calculated using asegstatsdiff.
Knut Jørgen Bjuland
Volume name
Mean(range)
Left-Lateral-Ventricle
7.4 (-0.13,130.72)
Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter
0.64 (-22.9,56.15)
Left-Cerebellum-Cortex
7.56 (-10.3,19.17)
Left-Thalamus-Proper
0.12 (-16.31,32.42)
Left-Caudate
-4.25 (-12,33.64)
Left-Putamen
-16.72 (-27.99,8.3)
Left-Pallidum
16.23 (-22.94,84.75)
Left-Hippocampus
-1.74 (-13.53,15.93)
Left-Amygdala
2.29 (-19.28,41.04)
Right-Lateral-Ventricle
4.6 (-24.77,102.12)
Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter
-3.2 (-20.87,49.37)
Right-Cerebellum-Cortex
4.88 (-12.99,14.36)
Right-Thalamus-Proper
1.06 (-22.34,19.99)
Right-Caudate
-6.08 (-14.59,6.13)
Right-Putamen
-12.87 (-31.37,10.17)
Right-Pallidum
14.01 (-27.79,89.19)
Right-Hippocampus
-1.71 (-9.29,12.02)
Right-Amygdala
3.74 (-18.6,51.01)
Right-Accumbens-area
-9.14 (-37.89,61.02)
CC_Posterior
22.07 (-47.04,525.51)
CC_Mid_Posterior
53.59 (-11.3,537.3)
CC_Central
36.77 (-21.36,317.24)
CC_Mid_Anterior
24.09 (-18.86,128.31)
CC_Anterior
10.64 (-33.71,152.33)
lhCortexVol
3.13 (-1.31,12.37)
rhCortexVol
3.16 (-0.36,14.2)
CortexVol
3 (-4.47,13.26)
EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol
0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
On 21 Apr 2017, at 20:01, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.commailto:knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote:
Dear FreeSurfer expert,
I have compared the aseg volume between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 with asegstatsdiff from FreeSurfer 6.0 for each subject in my data set. I have enclosed the range for some of the volume. I found the largest differences in subcortical structures, especially in Corpus callosum(CC). I found that FreeSurfer 6.0 CC posterior volume was 525.51 % larger than in FreeSurfer 5.3. Nevertheless, these differences were much smaller for lhCortex, but also here FreeSurfer 6.0 was on average larger than FreeSurfer 5.3. I ran the FreeSurfer 6.0 using the same option as FreeSurfer 5.30. Both versions of FreeSurfer were run on Centos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes.
Best regards Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD NTNU
Left-Lateral-Ventricle
7.4 (-0.13,130.72)
Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter
0.64 (-22.9,56.15)
Left-Cerebellum-Cortex
7.56 (-10.3,19.17)
Left-Thalamus-Proper
0.12 (-16.31,32.42)
Left-Caudate
-4.25 (-12,33.64)
Left-Putamen
-16.72 (-27.99,8.3)
Left-Pallidum
16.23 (-22.94,84.75)
Left-Hippocampus
-1.74 (-13.53,15.93)
Left-Amygdala
2.29 (-19.28,41.04)
Right-Lateral-Ventricle
4.6 (-24.77,102.12)
Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter
-3.2 (-20.87,49.37)
Right-Cerebellum-Cortex
4.88 (-12.99,14.36)
Right-Thalamus-Proper
1.06 (-22.34,19.99)
Right-Caudate
-6.08 (-14.59,6.13)
Right-Putamen
-12.87 (-31.37,10.17)
Right-Pallidum
14.01 (-27.79,89.19)
Right-Hippocampus
-1.71 (-9.29,12.02)
Right-Amygdala
3.74 (-18.6,51.01)
Right-Accumbens-area
-9.14 (-37.89,61.02)
CC_Posterior
22.07 (-47.04,525.51)
CC_Mid_Posterior
53.59 (-11.3,537.3)
CC_Central
36.77 (-21.36,317.24)
CC_Mid_Anterior
24.09 (-18.86,128.31)
CC_Anterior
10.64 (-33.71,152.33)
lhCortexVol
3.13 (-1.31,12.37)
rhCortexVol
3.16 (-0.36,14.2)
CortexVol
3 (-4.47,13.26)
EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol
0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi, In my dataset, the lateral ventricles are filled in the wm.mgz (picture). However the aseg.mgz shows that these voxels were correctly classified as lateral ventricles. In another thread on this mailing list, I was advised to fill in the ventricular voxels as wm.mgz if the surfaces are not correct. Am I doing something wrongly?
Thanks.
On Thursday, May 4, 2017 10:18 AM, Knut J Bjuland knutjorgen@outlook.com wrote:
Hi Are there any options that I can use in Freesurfer 6.0 that can prevent left lateral ventricle from being filled with WM? Should I send the MPRAGE sequence information? Knut Jørgen
On 2 May 2017, at 17:57, Douglas Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: This is a test we do before we release. The averages don't look out of line. Putamen should be smaller because we now try to remove claustrum. Small structures may have some large percent differences. Some structures are not that meaningful (like the CC because it has no real boundaries). The left lateral ventricle may be a problem. I've seen cases where it totally gets filled in with WM in v6. Others are hard to define -- when I would look at the scans there would not be a good case for rejecting one and accepting the other (eg, pallidum and thalamus don't have good contrast at typical mprage acq parameters).
On 5/2/17 3:56 AM, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
Dear FreeSurfer experts, When I ran Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 I ran with default settings using this command. recon-all -s (id) -all for both Freesurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0.Are these differences larger than one would expect? I think that 100% may be a little high? The difference in volume between Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 is shown in the table below calculated using asegstatsdiff. Knut Jørgen Bjuland
| Volume name | Mean(range) | | Left-Lateral-Ventricle | 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) | | Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter | 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) | | Left-Cerebellum-Cortex | 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) | | Left-Thalamus-Proper | 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) | | Left-Caudate | -4.25 (-12,33.64) | | Left-Putamen | -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) | | Left-Pallidum | 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) | | Left-Hippocampus | -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) | | Left-Amygdala | 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) | | Right-Lateral-Ventricle | 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) | | Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter | -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) | | Right-Cerebellum-Cortex | 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) | | Right-Thalamus-Proper | 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) | | Right-Caudate | -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) | | Right-Putamen | -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) | | Right-Pallidum | 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) | | Right-Hippocampus | -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) | | Right-Amygdala | 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) | | Right-Accumbens-area | -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) | | CC_Posterior | 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) | | CC_Mid_Posterior | 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) | | CC_Central | 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) | | CC_Mid_Anterior | 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) | | CC_Anterior | 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) | | lhCortexVol | 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) | | rhCortexVol | 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) | | CortexVol | 3 (-4.47,13.26) | | EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol | 0.65 (-0.05,26.52) |
On 21 Apr 2017, at 20:01, Knut J Bjuland knutjorgen@outlook.com wrote: Dear FreeSurfer expert, I have compared the aseg volume between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 with asegstatsdiff from FreeSurfer 6.0 for each subject in my data set. I have enclosed the range for some of the volume. I found the largest differences in subcortical structures, especially in Corpus callosum(CC). I found that FreeSurfer 6.0 CC posterior volume was 525.51 % larger than in FreeSurfer 5.3. Nevertheless, these differences were much smaller for lhCortex, but also here FreeSurfer 6.0 was on average larger than FreeSurfer 5.3. I ran the FreeSurfer 6.0 using the same option as FreeSurfer 5.30. Both versions of FreeSurfer were run on Centos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes. Best regards Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD NTNU
| Left-Lateral-Ventricle | 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) | | Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter | 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) | | Left-Cerebellum-Cortex | 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) | | Left-Thalamus-Proper | 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) | | Left-Caudate | -4.25 (-12,33.64) | | Left-Putamen | -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) | | Left-Pallidum | 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) | | Left-Hippocampus | -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) | | Left-Amygdala | 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) | | Right-Lateral-Ventricle | 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) | | Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter | -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) | | Right-Cerebellum-Cortex | 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) | | Right-Thalamus-Proper | 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) | | Right-Caudate | -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) | | Right-Putamen | -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) | | Right-Pallidum | 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) | | Right-Hippocampus | -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) | | Right-Amygdala | 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) | | Right-Accumbens-area | -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) | | CC_Posterior | 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) | | CC_Mid_Posterior | 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) | | CC_Central | 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) | | CC_Mid_Anterior | 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) | | CC_Anterior | 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) | | lhCortexVol | 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) | | rhCortexVol | 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) | | CortexVol | 3 (-4.47,13.26) | | EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol | 0.65 (-0.05,26.52) |
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline%C2%A0. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi Shane
if you upload this subject I will take a look
cheers Bruce On Thu, 4 May 2017, Shane Schofield wrote:
Hi,
In my dataset, the lateral ventricles are filled in the wm.mgz (picture). However the aseg.mgz shows that these voxels were correctly classified as lateral ventricles. In another thread on this mailing list, I was advised to fill in the ventricular voxels as wm.mgz if the surfaces are not correct. Am I doing something wrongly?
Inline image
Thanks.
On Thursday, May 4, 2017 10:18 AM, Knut J Bjuland knutjorgen@outlook.com wrote:
Hi
Are there any options that I can use in Freesurfer 6.0 that can prevent lef t lateral ventricle from being filled with WM? Should I send the MPRAGE seq uence information?
Knut Jørgen
On 2 May 2017, at 17:57, Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:This is a test we do before we release. The averages don't look out of line. Putamen should be smaller because we now try to remove claustrum. Small structures may have some large percent differences. Some structures are not that meaningful (like the CC because it has no real boundaries). The left lateral ventricle may be a problem. I've seen cases where it totally gets filled in with WM in v6. Others are hard to define -- when I would look at the scans there would not be a good case for rejecting one and accepting the other (eg, pallidum and thalamus don't have good contrast at typical mprage acq parameters).
On 5/2/17 3:56 AM, Knut J Bjuland wrote: Dear FreeSurfer experts, When I ran Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesurfer 6.0 I ran with default settings us ing this command. recon-all -s (id) -all for both Freesurfer 5.3 and FreeSu rfer 6.0. Are these differences larger than one would expect? I think that 100% may b e a little high? The difference in volume between Freesurfer 5.3 and Freesu rfer 6.0 is shown in the table below calculated using asegstatsdiff. Knut Jørgen Bjuland
Volume name Mean(range) Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
On 21 Apr 2017, at 20:01, Knut J Bjuland <knutjorgen@outlook.com> wrote:Dear FreeSurfer expert, I have compared the aseg volume between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 w ith asegstatsdiff from FreeSurfer 6.0 for each subject in my data set. I ha ve enclosed the range for some of the volume. I found the largest differenc es in subcortical structures, especially in Corpus callosum(CC). I found th at FreeSurfer 6.0 CC posterior volume was 525.51 % larger than in FreeSurfe r 5.3. Nevertheless, these differences were much smaller for lhCortex, but
?? ?also here FreeSurfer 6.0 was on average larger than FreeSurfer 5.3. I ran t
he FreeSurfer 6.0 using the same option as FreeSurfer 5.30. Both versions o f FreeSurfer were run on Centos. I am also enclosing a table with mean values along with min and max for differences between FreeSurfer 5.3 and FreeSurfer 6.0 aseg volumes. Best regards Knut Jørgen Bjuland PhD NTNU
Left-Lateral-Ventricle 7.4 (-0.13,130.72) Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter 0.64 (-22.9,56.15) Left-Cerebellum-Cortex 7.56 (-10.3,19.17) Left-Thalamus-Proper 0.12 (-16.31,32.42) Left-Caudate -4.25 (-12,33.64) Left-Putamen -16.72 (-27.99,8.3) Left-Pallidum 16.23 (-22.94,84.75) Left-Hippocampus -1.74 (-13.53,15.93) Left-Amygdala 2.29 (-19.28,41.04) Right-Lateral-Ventricle 4.6 (-24.77,102.12) Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter -3.2 (-20.87,49.37) Right-Cerebellum-Cortex 4.88 (-12.99,14.36) Right-Thalamus-Proper 1.06 (-22.34,19.99) Right-Caudate -6.08 (-14.59,6.13) Right-Putamen -12.87 (-31.37,10.17) Right-Pallidum 14.01 (-27.79,89.19) Right-Hippocampus -1.71 (-9.29,12.02) Right-Amygdala 3.74 (-18.6,51.01) Right-Accumbens-area -9.14 (-37.89,61.02) CC_Posterior 22.07 (-47.04,525.51) CC_Mid_Posterior 53.59 (-11.3,537.3) CC_Central 36.77 (-21.36,317.24) CC_Mid_Anterior 24.09 (-18.86,128.31) CC_Anterior 10.64 (-33.71,152.33) lhCortexVol 3.13 (-1.31,12.37) rhCortexVol 3.16 (-0.36,14.2) CortexVol 3 (-4.47,13.26) EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol 0.65 (-0.05,26.52)
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline%C2%A0. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu