Hi Zheng, there is something wrong with your math. When I sum up all the columns in your table from Left-Lateral-Ventricle to CC_Anterior, I get 215952 for the first row (you get only 67548). Can you double check your calculations? doug
On 10/28/2012 11:53 PM, Zheng Hui wrote:
Forgot to attach the excel file. Sorry for that.
From: zhenghui <zheng.hui@duke-nus.edu.sg mailto:zheng.hui@duke-nus.edu.sg> Date: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:52 AM To: Douglas N Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: [Freesurfer] Total cerebral volume.
Hi Doug,
Thanks for replying. But our datasets do showed that Sum(all structures (after ICV in the list) except ventricle, CSF, cerebellum and brainstem) is much smaller SubCortGrayVol. The former is only about 30-40% of the later. We are using FS 5.1.0 without the SupraTentorialVol fix.I attached the aseg file for your reference (the last three columns in the sheet).
Thanks, Zheng Hui
On 10/24/2012 09:01 AM, Zheng Hui wrote:
Hi freesurfer,
We are trying to calculate the total cerebral volume which excludes
cerebellum, brainstem, ventricle and CSF from the aseg.txt. Do we use
CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + SubCortGrayVol Or CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + Sum(all structures (after ICV in
the list) except ventricle, CSF, cerebellum and brainstem) This should give very close to the same value. I don't think it makes a difference.
Also, I saw Doug's post about the bug fixing for SupraTentorialVol.
To re-run the segstats for longitudinal subjects, any extra step other than "recon-all –long tpN baseID –segstats" and does it affect any other structure or just SupraTentorialVol? It should not affect other structures. doug
Can you send me the aseg.stats file for a single subject where you are seeing this effect? doug
On 11/08/2012 03:45 AM, Zheng Hui wrote:
Hi Doug, I sum all structures except ventricle, CSF, cerebellum and brainstem in order to compare with SubCortGrayVol. Even the former includes some white matter structures and all subcortical structures, it is smaller compared to SubCortGrayVol.
My original question is about calculating the total cerebral volumes, when I found *CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + SubCortGrayVol* is much bigger than *CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + Sum(all structures (after ICV in the list) except ventricle, CSF, cerebellum and brainstem)*.
Hope I explained it better this time.
Cheers, Zheng Hui
On 11/6/12 2:14 AM, "Douglas N Greve" <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Zheng, there is something wrong with your math. When I sum up all the columns in your table from Left-Lateral-Ventricle to CC_Anterior, I get 215952 for the first row (you get only 67548). Can you double check your calculations? doug On 10/28/2012 11:53 PM, Zheng Hui wrote: Forgot to attach the excel file. Sorry for that. From: zhenghui <zheng.hui@duke-nus.edu.sg <mailto:zheng.hui@duke-nus.edu.sg> <mailto:zheng.hui@duke-nus.edu.sg> <mailto:zheng.hui@duke-nus.edu.sg%3E>> Date: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:52 AM To: Douglas N Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%3E>> Subject: [Freesurfer] Total cerebral volume. Hi Doug, Thanks for replying. But our datasets do showed that Sum(all structures (after ICV in the list) except ventricle, CSF, cerebellum and brainstem) is much smaller SubCortGrayVol. The former is only about 30-40% of the later. We are using FS 5.1.0 without the SupraTentorialVol fix.I attached the aseg file for your reference (the last three columns in the sheet). Thanks, Zheng Hui On 10/24/2012 09:01 AM, Zheng Hui wrote: > > Hi freesurfer, > > We are trying to calculate the total cerebral volume which excludes cerebellum, brainstem, ventricle and CSF from the aseg.txt. Do we use > > CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + SubCortGrayVol > Or > CortexVol + CorticalWhiteMatterVol + Sum(all structures (after ICV in the list) except ventricle, CSF, cerebellum and brainstem) This should give very close to the same value. I don't think it makes a difference. > > > Also, I saw Doug's post about the bug fixing for SupraTentorialVol. To re-run the segstats for longitudinal subjects, any extra step other than "recon-all –long tpN baseID –segstats" and does it affect any other structure or just SupraTentorialVol? It should not affect other structures. doug -- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu