Hello all-
I'm having some trouble with sessions in which the pial surface is not matching up with the cortical segmentation. Subjects were run on a 1.5T Vision scanner and we're using an average of 3 MPRAGEs. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to troubleshoot this issue? I've attached a snapshot illustrating this problem.
Thanks, Tessa
These materials are private and may contain Protected Health Information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return email.
The cortical segmentation from the aseg does not often line up very well as it is only based on a voxel/volume analysis. The aseg is not informed by the surface analysis.
doug
tmazzocc@artsci.wustl.edu wrote:
Hello all-
I'm having some trouble with sessions in which the pial surface is not matching up with the cortical segmentation. Subjects were run on a 1.5T Vision scanner and we're using an average of 3 MPRAGEs. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to troubleshoot this issue? I've attached a snapshot illustrating this problem.
Thanks, Tessa
These materials are private and may contain Protected Health Information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return email.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu