Hello, Thought that this might be of interest: We've found a case for which the talairach.xfm is grossly wrong (checked using tkregister2) but the automatic-failure detection of version 4.0.1 indicated no problems.
#-------------------------------------------- #@# Talairach Failure Detection Thu Oct 25 12:29:08 CDT 2007 /disk/conte_raid1/freesurfer/HASD_mprage_NOTDONE/010502_61774/mri
talairach_afd -T 0.005 -xfm transforms/talairach.xfm
talairach_afd: Talairach Transform: transforms/talairach.xfm OK (p=0.2262, pval=0.0169 >= threshold=0.0050)
#------------------------------------------
Is this something that anyone else has noticed so far?
thanks, Mike H.
Mike,
Can you send me the input files for that subject? That is, the files found in this directory of yours:
/disk/conte_raid1/freesurfer/HASD_mprage_NOTDONE/010502_61774/mri/orig
If so, you can upload them to me via the filedrop:
https://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Nick
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 12:41 -0500, Michael Harms wrote:
Hello, Thought that this might be of interest: We've found a case for which the talairach.xfm is grossly wrong (checked using tkregister2) but the automatic-failure detection of version 4.0.1 indicated no problems.
#-------------------------------------------- #@# Talairach Failure Detection Thu Oct 25 12:29:08 CDT 2007 /disk/conte_raid1/freesurfer/HASD_mprage_NOTDONE/010502_61774/mri
talairach_afd -T 0.005 -xfm transforms/talairach.xfm
talairach_afd: Talairach Transform: transforms/talairach.xfm OK (p=0.2262, pval=0.0169 >= threshold=0.0050)
#------------------------------------------
Is this something that anyone else has noticed so far?
thanks, Mike H.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu