p.s. I don't know why that option doesn't work - I didn't even realize it
existed
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013, falk.luese(a)gmx.net wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> well, there is an option called -correct_defect within
> mris_fix_topology, which is meant to correct just one defect at a time.
> However, after the defect is corrected one is getting a message like:
>
> ?TERMINATING AFTER CORRECTED DEFECT
>
> no such file or directory?
>
> I haven?t been able to figure out how to save this or if this is even
> possible. Maybe I am missing the correct flag to do so. May it otherwise be
> possible to remove certain defects from ?h.defect_labels or something
> similar?
>
> The errors of the filled.mgz result in a faulty surface
> reconstruction of ?h.orig.nofix and every following surface like ?h.white
> and ?.pial in that area. Therefore I wanted to remove these in before and,
> if possible, automatically.
>
> Best,
> Falk
>
> Von: Bruce Fischl
> Gesendet: ?22?. ?März? ?2013 ?19?:?14
> An: ""Falk Lüsebrink"" <falk.luese(a)gmx.net>
> Cc: FreeSurfer
> Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] Two questions regarding mri_fill and
> mris_fix_topology
>
> Hi Falk
>
> I don't think it's possible to fix just one defect, unless Florent
> included some option that I am not aware of.
>
> I also wouldn't worry too much about the filled.mgz. Make sure that the
> aseg.mgz and the ?h.white and ?h.pial are accurate
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2013,
> "Falk Lüsebrink" wrote:
>
> > Dear FreeSurfers,
> >
> > I am processing some T1-weighted images of the human brain with an
> isotropic resolution of .5 mm using version 5.1.
> >
> > After mri_fill my hemispheres are separated nicely and the cerebellum is
> completely removed. However, looking at the filled.mgz, posterior and
> > superior of the corpus callosum some residual of white matter can be found
> in the longitudinal fissure. It does not remain if I look at the
> > conformed data, altough these leftovers are found in the wm.mgz of both
> datasets. As this does not happen using conformed data I assume that the
> > cutting plane is not "broad" enough in case of higher resolution data or
> something related. Is there some way to tweak this?
> >
> > Secondly, I currently skip the -fix stage of recon-all completely while
> processing this data, but I would like to correct at least some of its
> > defects. I already I have seen in the help of mris_fix_topology that it is
> possible to fix just one defect and I extracted the defects and their
> > number of vertices using the defect-seg script. Is it possible to save the
> resulting surface, so I am able to correct the defects I want
> > to consecutively?
> >
> > Best,
> > Falk
> >
> >
>
>