Dear experts,
Upgrading to 5.2.0 stopped QDEC (specifically, mri_concat) from
misbehaving, and so after running a first whole-brain group cortical
thickness analysis on my structural data, I have some questions:
1. After running recon-all with the –qcache flag (i.e. presmoothing), files
of the type lh.thickness.*.mgh were created for all 38 subjects (19 in each
group), however files of the type *rh*.thickness.*.mgh were not created for
5 out of the 19 subjects of the first group. Log files *recon-all-status.log
* and *recon-all.log* (attached, for one of those 5 subjects) both mention
that the process ran on Mar22nd ended with errors, although I can't quite
see what that was
2. When I take age as a continuous factor (covariate), the list of clusters
in my results look dramatically different from the clusters that I get for
the same contrast ran without the covariate. Why is that, given that
normally adding a covariate very rarely changes the results by a great
deal? Also in my case, I had quite a narrow (and well-balanced between the
groups) age range!
3. I know that discrete factors cannot be taken as nuisance factors, but it
seems they also can't be taken as covariates. How does one, then, control
for the effects of e.g. gender in a group comparison?
4. When should values other than 10 be used for the FWHM parameter of the
smoothing?
5. How come QDEC allows you to set the FWHM parameter, when in fact it is
also set in the qcache stage of recon-all, which precedes QDEC?
Many thanks in advance!!
Tudor