Freesurfer April 2013

freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

131 participants
220 discussions

mri_glmfit --no-sim error: cannot find any csd files
by Jeni Chen 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

Hello, I was trying to run mri_glmfit-sim at a lower cwpvalthresh so I specified the --no-sim option to avoid re-running the entire simulation again. I entered my DSC file but in the end I get the error message: "cannot find any csd files". Here is what I entered: mri_glmfit-sim \ --glmdir GLMFIT/LH_1GroupAvg_ModVAS_nuissanceAGE_DOSS \ --cwpvalthresh .999 \ --no-sim GLMFIT/LH_1GroupAvg_ModVAS_nuissanceAGE_DOSS/csd/mc-z.abs.3.j001-1GroupAvg-Cor-thickness-Mod-VAS.csd I copied and pasted the csd file from its own folder to the top directory, but it gave the same error. I've attached the error log in case you want to have a look. Thanks for your help! Jeni

2 1

surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu down?
by Graham Wideman 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

Hi MGH-ers, >From where I sit (San Diego), http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/ seems to have been non-responsive at least since about 4 pm west-coast time. It's now 4:40 pm. http://nmr.mgh.harvard.edu is working fine. Perhaps you are already on top of this, but in case not... Thanks, -- Graham

3 2

Re: [Freesurfer] Fwd: Conversion
by Douglas N Greve 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

This looks wrong: W = TalXFM * Norig * inv(Torig); If RAS = A.vox2ras1 * [i;j;k;1]; (Note: vox2ras = Norig), then just mni305 = TalXFM*A.vox2ras1 * [i;j;k;1] One way to check is to display the MNI305 and ScannerRAS in the tkmedit control window. Take the RAS from the control window, put it into your formula and see if you the MNI305value. doug On 04/24/2013 12:00 PM, Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga wrote: > Hi Doug, > I try to make the question shorter, hopefully you will be able to give > me a hint: > > Do you think this method to cut every subjects hippo-subfield > according to their MNI305 Y coordinate could be accurate? > > (for every voxel in every subfield for every subject, do: ) > > > RAS = A.vox2ras1 * [i;j;k;1]; > > > MNI305 = W * RAS; % W = TalXFM * Norig * inv(Torig); > > > if MNI305(2) < -20 then A.vol(i,j,k) = 0; > > > I find that every subject is cut very differently (the Y plane goes > usually to the head), where do you think could be the error, in the > within subject vox2ras or in the MNI305 transformation? Shouldn't I > use this method at all? > > > many many thanks again, > Gari > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga* <garikoitz(a)gmail.com > <mailto:garikoitz@gmail.com>> > Date: Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:31 AM > Subject: Conversion > To: Douglas N Greve <greve(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> > > > Hi Doug, > sorry to bother you again with a direct message, one of your > colleagues has been helping out but I don't think he got it right and > before posting it publicly I would like to know your opinion. > > *OBJECTIVE*: > I want to cut hippo-subfields with a vertical plane in Y. That plane > is defined by a MNI305 coordinate (Y = -20). > > > *METHOD*: > I created a script in Matlab that reads (per every subject): > > TalXFM = xfm_read('talairach.xfm'); > > ORIG = MRIread('orig.mgz'); > > Norig = ORIG.vox2ras; > > Torig = ORIG.tkrvox2ras; > > W = TalXFM * Norig * inv(Torig); > > And reads every hippo_subfield: > > A = MRIread('posterior_left_CA1.mgz'); > > A.vol=permute(A.vol,[2 1 3]); > > Then I just loop through every voxel to set to zero all voxels one > side of that MNI305 coordinate: > > > RAS = A.vox2ras1 * [i;j;k;1]; > > > MNI305 = W * RAS; > > > if MNI305(2) < -20 then A.vol(i,j,k) = 0; > > Then I permute and write it again (afterwards I can sum the modified > volumes per every subfield). > > > A.vol=permute(A.vol,[2 1 3]); > > > MRIwrite(A, 'new_posterior_left_CA1.mgz'); > > > *PROBLEM*: > the vertical plane is not ok, usually it goes out of the hippocampus > or just touches a bit of it (it should separate the head, so be a > quarter of it). But it is a vertical plane. > > > *QUESTIONS*: > > RAS = A.vox2ras1 * [i;j;k;1]; >> Is this Scanner_RAS or Volume_RAS? > > In any case, it gives wrong results (when I compare to freeview or > tkmedit), is this method of calculating RAS coordinates ok? Is there > any other method? > > MNI305 = W * RAS; >> What RAS coordinate should I use here? The > obtained in the previous step is OK? > > Do you think that these methods are accurate enough to accomplish > what I am trying to do or I should try another approach? > > > > Many many thanks again for your help, I will be happy to make the > results available for everybody if this works (I think this makes the > second Samuel Adams :) ) > br, > Gari > > -- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

1 0

Re: [Freesurfer] Fwd: Comparing HRF undershoots between conditions
by Douglas N Greve 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

You don't generate a negative coefficient. The sign and magnitude of the coefficient is determined by the fitting procedure. It may be the case that a positive coef fits the data better than a negative. You should not change the gamma parameters. doug On 04/24/2013 04:06 PM, SHAHIN NASR wrote: > > I know but how can we generate negative coefficient? To clarify, we > use alpha=2, delta=2.25 tau=1.25 to generate default HRF. Using > negative values for alpha, delta or tau, does not invert the shape of > the curve (HRF). > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Douglas N Greve > <greve(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote: > > > What do you mean the gamma function generates positive values? It > will create a regressor with a positive-going HRF. However, the > regression coefficient can be negative which would invert the > shape. The reg coef is fit to the data, so the data will tell you > whether there is an undershoot or not. > doug > > > > On 04/24/2013 03:02 PM, SHAHIN NASR wrote: > > Hi Doug, > Sorry to follow this topic with a delay but we tried to > model BOLD signal undershoot with a gamma function and we > failed. The problem is, gamma function generates positive > values and we can NOT use "inverse gamma function" (or > otherfunction similar to that) as a part of mkanalysis-sess > (for modeling BOLD signal undershoot). We even used matlab > gammafit to estimate parameters and it said that values should > be positive otherwise gammafit function fails. > Do you have any suggestion? > > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Douglas N Greve > <greve(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>> wrote: > > > yes, that is what you want. The only other way that comes > to mind > is to model each event type as two event types one delayed > relative to the other. Then model the responseto each as a > gamma. > If the delay is right, then the first gamma should model > the main > positive response and the second gamma will model the negative > response. both will be independent from the other. > > doug > > > On 04/10/2013 05:00 PM, shahin(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > <mailto:shahin@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > <mailto:shahin@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > <mailto:shahin@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote: > > I think I figured it out but I want to double check. I am > generating > group-average map for my subjects using isxconcat-sess > command > which > generates ces maps for each time frame. I think these > maps are > what I > wanted. Right? > If you still have other solutions that you think may > generate more > reliable results, I am eager to know. For instance, is > there > anyway to > fit a model as we do for spmhrf or fslhrf, but just > for the > negative > peak? > > Regards > > That's the problem Doug. I have already generated > the FIR > model but how > can > I show the sig MAP for one "particulat time > point". What > are the other > ways? > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Douglas N Greve > <greve(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>>wrote: > > > Hi Shahin, there are several ways that you > could do > it. The one that > immediately comes to mind is to use an FIR and > then > test for a > difference > at a particular post stimulus time point. > doug > > > > > On 04/10/2013 03:54 PM, SHAHIN NASR wrote: > > Hi, > I want to generate a map to show the > significant difference > between > HRF undershoot (negative peak of activity) > between two conditions > independent from the positive peak. Is there > anyway, to generate this > map? > > P.S.: Please note that I need a map and > not a time > course graph. > > > -- > Shahin Nasr > > PhD in Cognitive Neuroscience > Martinos Imaging Center, MGH > Harvard Medical School > > -- > Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. > MGH-NMR Center > greve(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> > Phone Number: 617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358> > <tel:617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358>> > Fax: 617-726-7422 <tel:617-726-7422> > <tel:617-726-7422 <tel:617-726-7422>> > > Bugs: > surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/**fswiki/BugReporting > <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/**fswiki/BugReporting> > > <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/**fswiki/BugReporting><http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting> > FileDrop: > www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/**facility/filedrop/index.html > <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/**facility/filedrop/index.html> > > <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/**facility/filedrop/index.html><http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html> > > > Outgoing: > ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/** > greve/ > > <ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/> > > > > > -- > Shahin Nasr > > PhD in Cognitive Neuroscience > Martinos Imaging Center, MGH > Harvard Medical School > > > > -- > Shahin Nasr > > PhD in Cognitive Neuroscience > Martinos Imaging Center, MGH > Harvard Medical School > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> > > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > > -- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. > MGH-NMR Center > greve(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> > Phone Number: 617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358> > <tel:617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358>> > Fax: 617-726-7422 <tel:617-726-7422> <tel:617-726-7422 > <tel:617-726-7422>> > > Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting > <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting> > <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting> > FileDrop: > www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html > <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html> > <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html> > Outgoing: > ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/ > > > > > > -- > Shahin Nasr > > PhD in Cognitive Neuroscience > Martinos Imaging Center, MGH > Harvard Medical School > > > -- > Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. > MGH-NMR Center > greve(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > Phone Number: 617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358> > Fax: 617-726-7422 <tel:617-726-7422> > > Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting > <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting> > FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 > www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html > <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html> > Outgoing: > ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/ > > > > > > -- > Shahin Nasr > > PhD in Cognitive Neuroscience > Martinos Imaging Center, MGH > Harvard Medical School -- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center greve(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

1 0

Fwd: Comparing HRF undershoots between conditions
by SHAHIN NASR 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

That's the problem Doug. I have already generated the FIR model but how can I show the sig MAP for one "particulat time point". What are the other ways? On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Douglas N Greve <greve(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>wrote: > Hi Shahin, there are several ways that you could do it. The one that > immediately comes to mind is to use an FIR and then test for a difference > at a particular post stimulus time point. > doug > > > > > On 04/10/2013 03:54 PM, SHAHIN NASR wrote: > >> Hi, >> I want to generate a map to show the significant difference between >> HRF undershoot (negative peak of activity) between two conditions >> independent from the positive peak. Is there anyway, to generate this map? >> >> P.S.: Please note that I need a map and not a time course graph. >> >> >> -- >> Shahin Nasr >> >> PhD in Cognitive Neuroscience >> Martinos Imaging Center, MGH >> Harvard Medical School >> > > -- > Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. > MGH-NMR Center > greve(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Phone Number: 617-724-2358 > Fax: 617-726-7422 > > Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/**fswiki/BugReporting<http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting> > FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/**facility/filedrop/index.html<http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html> > Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/** > greve/ <ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/> > > > -- Shahin Nasr PhD in Cognitive Neuroscience Martinos Imaging Center, MGH Harvard Medical School -- Shahin Nasr PhD in Cognitive Neuroscience Martinos Imaging Center, MGH Harvard Medical School

3 6

smooth overlay
by Thomas Janssens 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

Dear Freesurfers, During the display of my data in tksurfer I smoothed my overlay with 1 smoothing step (Tools > Surface > Smooth Overlay... ). All I could figure out was that this is done by sclv_smooth but what is exactly happening mathematically in this case? What does 1 smoothing step correspond to? Thanks a lot for your help! Regards, Thomas Janssens Thomas Janssens, PhD student FWO Laboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie K.U.Leuven Medical School Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven (Belgium) phone +32 16 33 00 35 cell phone +32 494 115 509 thomasj(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu thomas.janssens(a)med.kuleuven.be

2 1

Re: [Freesurfer] cwpvalthresh not specified
by Jeni Chen 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

Phew! Thanks! jeni

1 0

cwpvalthresh not specified
by Jeni Chen 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

Hello, Just a quick question, if the 'cwpvalthresh' flag wasn't specified when running mri_glmfit-sim, the script will use the default .05 value, correct? Thanks for clairfying. Jeni Chen

2 1

merging dti data
by Jon Wieser 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

we captured some dti data. there were 2 runs. we acquired in the axial plane, 2mm slice thickness the first run captured the lower half of the brain, slice locations: I56-S20, and the second run captured the upper half of the brain S16-S92. i have made briks from each of these runs. I can convert the briks to nifti files I want to merge the nifti files together to analyze the data in tracula In the past i have merged data from two dti runs, but each run have covered the entire brain, with the following commands mri_convert MJ0001dti1+orig.BRIK MJ0001dti1.nii.gz mri_convert MJ0001dti2+orig.BRIK MJ0001dti2.nii.gz mri_concat --i MJ0001dti1.nii.gz MJ0001dti2.nii.gz --o MJ0001dti12.nii.gz would it work to concat the two half brain niftis into one file and analyze that with tracula? (I will concat the bvec and bvals files too) would this cause problems doing it this way? Thanks Jon -- Jon Wieser Research Specialist UW-Milwaukee Psychology Department, Pearse Hall Rm 366 2441 East Hartford Ave Milwaukee, WI 53211 Phone: 414-229-7145

3 8

transformation between cvs and native space
by Kami Koldewyn 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

Hi All, We have contiguous ROIs in cvs template (volume) space. We need to move this to each individual subject's surface. What's the best way of doing this? We tried going from template volume to individual volume to individual surface, but these rois were not all contiguous on the surface -- in some cases they were split nearly in half (most likely because they were placed on either side of a sulcus). We could try to correct for this problem in each individual, but that would be very labor-intensive and pretty subjective across individuals. We're thinking that it would be better to go from template volume to template surface and then from template surface to individual surface -- this way we can make all of our corrections on the template surface, which would make ad hoc corrections not different across subjects. But we're not sure what the best way to do this is as the cvs transform that allows us to get back to subject-specific native space is a volume transform: 1. Do people think that going to template surface rather than individual volume is the better intermediate step? 2. If yes, do you think it's best to move to the CVS surface and then use spherical surface alignment transform to move from the template surface to each individual surface - or is there a better way to do this? Any pointers on how to do this with the smallest number of transformations and/or steps that require morphing or interpolation would be greatly appreciated. sorry for the long email, and thanks in advance! -kami --------------------------------------------------------------- Kami Koldewyn, PhD. McGovern Institute for Brain Research MIT, Building 46 Room 4141 (Kanwisher Lab) Cambridge, MA 02139 kamik(a)mit.edu

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
22
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Freesurfer April 2013