Hi,
I want to do source localization on 128-channel EEG. For that, I need to
create 3-layer head models for our subjects. However, our current MRI
protocol only includes MPRAGE.
I've talked with the (f)MRI team on our project about adding a single FLASH
scan in their protocol. They are mainly concerned about the time
requirement.
So my questions are:
1) Is it possible to get a decent 3-layer head model just from MPRAGE using
FreeSurfer or other tools like SPM?
2) If we have to use FLASH, which protocol we should use?
I found one at
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FreeSurferWiki?action=AttachFile&…
I don't know if this is the most recent one -- is there a newer FLASH
protocol that can produce decent skull boundaries and takes less time to
run.
3) Is there a FLASH protocol already imported on Bay 1 (Skyra scanner) at
Martinos (where the MPRAGE was run)? If not, is it ok to run FLASH and
MPRAGE on different scanners for the same subject?
I know this is a lot of questions. I really appreciate any responses.
Thanks!
Le
Professor Jill Goldstein is recruiting a postdoctoral fellow with expertise
in affective or cognitive neuroscience to join her lab, the CNL-SD (
http://cnl-sd.bwh.harvard.edu)
*Job Description*
This position requires the individual to have expertise in functional
MRI. Experience
with psychiatric disorders is preferable. Knowledge of paradigm
development, data analytic software (e.g., SPM, FSL), and statistical
underpinnings of fMRI are required.
Responsibilities of this position include analyses of fMRI studies of the
stress response, mood and anxiety, and hormonal responses; fetal
programming of sex differences in mood and psychotic disorders; and
implementation and analyses involved in a new neurostimulation study of
mood and autonomic nervous system function. Thus, the position includes
implementing methods for the analysis of fMRI data; developing
project-specific methods when necessary (i.e., ROI analysis); utilization
of advanced statistical methods to analyze fMRI, psychophysiological and
serology data; preparation of manuscripts for publication; preparation of
study findings and presentation at professional meetings; review and
summarization of relevant literature for manuscript background and grant
preparation; supervision of research assistant working on the study.
There are many opportunities for education and growth in multiple domains
in which we operate: neuroendocrinology, further neuroimaging training,
neuroanatomy, neuro-immune interface. We collaborate with world-class
scientists who are part of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Massachusetts
General Hospital, and others outside of the Harvard system.
Applicant should have a PhD or ScD in clinical psychology, neuropsychology,
and/or neuroscience or have an MD with fMRI expertise. We are committed to
diversity, and qualified women and minorities are strongly encouraged to
apply.
Please email a CV, cover letter of interest, 2-3 written references,
and a *brief
*writing sample to Ms. Abby Brockman*, (abrockman(a)partners.org
<abrockman(a)partners.org>), *Administrative Assistant to Jill Goldstein,
PhD, Professor of Psychiatry and Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Director
of Research, Connors Center for Women’s Health and Gender Biology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02120.
Hi Marie -
Thanks for your response. After sending my email I found the hemisphere
average values, but the values at each vertex and in each ROI will be very
helpful!
I tried the command you provided in tkmedit and it looks perfect - thanks!
But when I try what I think is the corresponding command in freeview:
freeview -v <SUBJ>/mri/brainmask.mgz <SUBJ>/mri/T1.mgz -f
<SUBJ>/surf/lh.pial-outer-smoothed
the images don't align (see attached). Am I doing something wrong?
~ Maria
Dear all,
I would like to work with the pial surfaces of my database and more
particularly with a point-to-point correspondance between each subject. But
I didn't find how to do that, only for longitudinal analysis of a single
subject which I am not interested.
Thanks in advance for you help,
Alexandre
Dear all,
I've looked a little bit further into why LGI fails for fsaverage. I
previously tried simply running recon-all -s fsaverage-localGI but the
script exited with errors after a good while. More importantly for me, the
lh.pial-outer-smoothed surface, which I am after, did not look right.
It seems that the first step, mris_fill, produces a volume that does not
look very much like a brain anymore (cf. attached screenshot). Any idea why
that would happen?
Thanks,
Pierre
--
Pierre Mégevand, MD, PhD
PLOS Neuro Community <http://neuro.plos.org> editor - Follow us on Twitter
<http://twitter.com/PLOSNeuro>
Postdoc @ Feinstein Institute for Medical Research (NY, USA)
Follow me on Twitter <http://twitter.com/pierre_vanmedge> - Read my blog
here <http://neuroscimed.wordpress.com>
Hi Bruce and FS group,
Thanks again for the speedy replies and help with everything. Quick
question about editing voxels (specifically those in the lh/rh insula).
Should I simply add specific voxels to the aparc+aseg for this step? It was
a little unclear on the wiki.
Also, is there a specific command to re-run the stats/etc. after these
edits are performed?
Thanks a lot,
Adam
I am conducting cortical thickness analyses between hundreds of individuals
for a study we are conducting. I was getting this error
Unrecognized sub-option flag 'annot_outline'. and so I tried to do the
group analysis tutorial and input the command from the end of it (please
see command below) but still got the same error. Freeview would open but it
would not show any images. Could you help me to resolve this issue please?
Also, what does it mean when it spits out invalid drawable?
freeview -f
$SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/surf/lh.inflated:annot=aparc.annot:annot_outline=1:overlay=lh.gender_age.glmdir/lh-Avg-thickness-age-Cor/sig.mgh:overlay_threshold=4,5
-viewport 3d
Thank you so much for your help!
Claire
--
*We shall not cease from exploration. And the end of all our exploring will
be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time- T.S.
Eliot*
Is the corpus callosum segmentation based on the Hofer and Frahm functional
parcellation, a mathematical formula, or, as listed on the website, 5 equal
subdivision roughly along the long axis? What is the preferred citation for
this?
Thanks.
Hi all,
I'm trying to get gyrification information about a single subject. I've
run the -localGI process but I have a few questions about the results:
1. When I try to plot the smoothed out pial surface over the brainmask in
freeview, I use the command
freeview -v subject/mri/brainmask.mgz -f subject/surf/lh.pial-outer-smoothed
but it appears to be an inflated surface of some sort. It doesn't hug the
contours of the brain mask as I expected (or as shown in the top image
here: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LGI) How can I see that
surface?
2. I see very little variation in the local GI. I'm wondering if the
third image in the link above is typical, and also how to get the blue to
red color scale as shown? I can only get red to yellow, which doesn't show
as much variation.
3. There is information on how to run analysis on a group of subjects, but
I'm wondering if it's possible to get numerical data on a single subject.
For instance: average GI in a given ROI, global GI, distribution (min, max,
std dev, etc.). If nothing else, can I get the numerical values for each
vertex?
Thanks for your help!
~ Maria Holland
Stanford University
I guess I'm not entirely sure how to do that? Are there any tutorials on how to extract an ROI from the aparc.stats file?
-----Original Message-----
From: freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 4:21 PM
To: freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Creating an ROI mask for Cortical Thickness Analysis
Why not just get it from the ?h.aparc.stats file?
On 10/22/2014 03:43 PM, Smith, Michael wrote:
> Hello Freesurfer's
>
> I am trying to look at the cortical thickness for a specific ROI on
> the cortical surface (Primary Auditory Cortex: transverse temporal
> gyri). I found a specific tutorial
> (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/VolumeRoiCorticalThickness)
> however the tutorial assumes I already have an ROI mask created. I was
> wondering if anyone had any tips on creating an ROI for the cortical
> surface from the parcellation/annotation files. I know you can
> "hand-draw" ROI's in tkmedit or freeview but I would prefer something
> less subjective that doesn't rely on my untrained eye and unsteady
> hand! Thanks in advance.
>
> Best,
>
> Michael S.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
greve(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.