Freesurfer June 2014

freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

155 participants
234 discussions

mri_ca_register error
by Liesel-Ann Meusel 24 Jun '14

24 Jun '14

Hi, I am running recon-all and I am getting the following error during the mri_ca_register step (full log file is attached). Please let me know what I need to do to fix it. Thank you, Liesel writing output transformation to transforms/talairach.m3z... GCAMwrite registration took 4 hours, 17 minutes and 32 seconds. ERROR: mri_ca_register with non-zero status 1 but continuing despite the error #-------------------------------------- #@# CA Reg Inv Sun Jun 1 22:03:47 EDT 2014 /home/lmeusel/101_TEST/mri mri_ca_register -invert-and-save transforms/talairach.m3z Loading, Inverting, Saving, Exiting ... Reading transforms/talairach.m3z Inverting GCAM Saving inverse ERROR: mri_ca_register with non-zero status 0 Linux gateway.neuroinfo.rri 2.6.32-279.9.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Sep 25 21:43:11 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux recon-all -s 101_TEST exited with ERRORS at Sun Jun 1 22:04:52 EDT 2014 -- Liesel-Ann Meusel Postdoctoral Fellow Rm 722, Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest 3560 Bathurst St. Toronto ON M6A 2E1 416-785-2500 ext. 3507 lmeusel(a)research.baycrest.org

2 1

Problem Visualization Hippocampal Subfields Freeview
by Joana Braga Pereira 24 Jun '14

24 Jun '14

Dear Freesurfers, I've been using freeview to visualize the hippocampal subfields segmentations in a group of subjects between 9 and 14 years of age. I observed that a strange black line is drawn around the subfields (please see attached figure) although the segmentation was carried out correctly. After exchanging some emails with an expert from the list, it seems that this problem is due to a visualization issue in freeview. Does anyone know how to solve it? I would like to take a snapshot of the subfields in freeview to make a figure. Thanks, Joana

1 0

Re: [Freesurfer] free-surfer longitudinal Qdec table
by Martin Reuter 24 Jun '14

24 Jun '14

Hi Anna, whenever it says qdec-long the table is in qdec format (with a fsid-base as second column. It would then use the longitudinally processed results, which is what you want , both for lme and 2 stage model. Best Martin Sent via my smartphone, please excuse brevity. -------- Original message -------- From: Anna Jonsson <ajonsson09(a)gmail.com> Date:06/09/2014 3:47 PM (GMT+01:00) To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] free-surfer longitudinal Qdec table Hi, sorry for more questions, but i have a few. When running the first step of the lme implemented tools, doing the command mris_preproc --qdec-long qdec.table.dat --target study_average --hemi lh --meas thickness --out lh.thickness.mgh (assembles your thickness data into a single lh.thickness.mgh file), am I correct that this just needs to be a "normal" cross-sectional qdec table that free surfer subsequently makes into long format by --qdec-long option? so the lnogitudinal qdec table is only used in the two stage modell? This too just uses the cross-sectionally derived scans? Im confused where the .long runs become used? thank you and kind wishes On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Martin Reuter <mreuter(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: Hi Anna, Fsid is the cross sectionall name without the .long. Best martin Sent via my smartphone, please excuse brevity. -------- Original message -------- From: Anna Jonsson Date:06/04/2014 7:22 AM (GMT-05:00) To: Freesurfer support list Subject: [Freesurfer] free-surfer longitudinal Qdec table Hi, I would like to make my freesurfer longitudinal qdec table for the to use in the lme matlab tools. However, does the fsid need to refer to the longitidunally derived subject; eg XXX.long, or the cross-sectionally derived subject, eg XXX. Im not sure based on the specification online. Kind Regards Anna _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.

2 1

mpr2mni305 failed, see transforms/talairach_avi.log
by Venkateswaran Rajagopalan 23 Jun '14

23 Jun '14

Hi All, I am getting the the following error when I run recon-all -subjid E368 -autorecon1 ERROR: mpr2mni305 failed, see transforms/talairach_avi.log Here is what talairach_avi.log says /home/administrator/Desktop/freesurfer/subjects_dir/E368/mri /usr/local/freesurfer/bin/talairach_avi --i orig_nu.mgz --xfm transforms/talairach.auto.xfm $Id: talairach_avi,v 1.9 2011/03/02 18:38:06 nicks Exp $ Linux administrator-HP-Pro-3330-MT 3.13.0-24-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Thu Apr 10 19:08:14 UTC 2014 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux Fri Jun 20 17:06:38 IST 2014 mri_convert orig_nu.mgz talsrcimg.img $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.7 2012/09/05 21:55:16 mreuter Exp $ reading from orig_nu.mgz... TR=0.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00 i_ras = (-1, 0, 0) j_ras = (0, 0, -1) k_ras = (0, 1, 0) writing to talsrcimg.img... Analyze Output Matrix -1.000 0.000 0.000 129.000; 0.000 0.000 1.000 -129.000; 0.000 -1.000 0.000 122.500; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; -------------------- INFO: set hdr.hist.orient to -1 mpr2mni305 talsrcimg Fri Jun 20 17:06:39 IST 2014 /usr/local/freesurfer/bin/mpr2mni305 talsrcimg $Id: mpr2mni305,v 1.4 2009/06/03 16:01:38 nicks Exp $ target=711-2C_as_mni_average_305 --------------------------------------------------------------------- analyzeto4dfp talsrcimg -O0 -y --------------------------------------------------------------------- $Id: ifh2hdr.c,v 1.3 2007/05/05 10:45:03 nicks Exp $ Fri Jun 20 17:06:40 2014 Writing: talsrcimg.4dfp.hdr $Id: analyzeto4dfp.c,v 1.2 2007/05/05 00:00:06 nicks Exp $ Reading: talsrcimg.hdr header size 348 bytes hdr.dime.datatype offset=70 value=2 hdr.dime.bitpix offset=72 value=8 hdr.hist.orient offset=252 value=-1 dimensionality 4 dimensions 256 256 256 1 Reading: talsrcimg.img Writing: talsrcimg.4dfp.img Writing: talsrcimg.4dfp.ifh ifh2hdr talsrcimg -r0to255 ori=2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- gauss_4dfp talsrcimg 1.1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- $Id: gauss_4dfp.c,v 1.3 2009/05/15 21:43:46 nicks Exp $ Reading: talsrcimg.4dfp.img Writing: talsrcimg_g11.4dfp.img image dimensions 256 256 256 padded to 288 288 288 processing volume 1$Id: ifh2hdr.c,v 1.3 2007/05/05 10:45:03 nicks Exp $ Fri Jun 20 17:06:46 2014 Writing: talsrcimg_g11.4dfp.hdr Writing: talsrcimg_g11.4dfp.ifh including: talsrcimg.4dfp.img.rec in talsrcimg_g11.4dfp.img.rec --------------------------------------------------------------------- imgreg_4dfp /usr/local/freesurfer/average/711-2C_as_mni_average_305 none talsrcimg_g11 none talsrcimg_to_711-2C_as_mni_average_305_t4 4355 --------------------------------------------------------------------- $Id: imgreg_4dfp.c,v 1.4 2010/02/27 01:41:53 nicks Exp $ imgreg_4dfp: /usr/local/freesurfer/average/711-2C_as_mni_average_305.4dfp.img read error /usr/local/freesurfer/average/711-2C_as_mni_average_305.4dfp.img 256 256 256 1 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 orientation T byte_order littleendian Reading image: /usr/local/freesurfer/average/711-2C_as_mni_average_305.4dfp.img dimensions: 256 256 256 mmppix: 1.0000 -1.0000 -1.0000 center: 128.0000 -129.0000 -129.0000 ERROR: 'imgreg_4dfp /usr/local/freesurfer/average/711-2C_as_mni_average_305 none talsrcimg_g11 none talsrcimg_to_711-2C_as_mni_average_305_t4 4355' failed! status=255 ERROR: mpr2mni305 execution aborted Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks Venkat

3 5

Re: [Freesurfer] Why the result was not same for the same subject
by kangchengwang0808＠gmail.com 23 Jun '14

23 Jun '14

Dear Nick The recon-all.log for one time was in the attachment. Thank you Wang Kangcheng

1 0

fMRI Image Acquisition and Analyses Course : October 16-18, 2014 (fwd)
by Bruce Fischl 23 Jun '14

23 Jun '14

FYI -- The Mind Research Network (MIND) is pleased to invite you to the fMRI Image Acquisition and Analyses Course held on October 16-18, 2014 on the campus of the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, New Mexico. For more information and registration, see http://www.mrn.org/education-outreach/courses-and-events/ Special topics include the unique issues that multiband EPI (i.e., whole brain subsecond EPI) brings to fMRI analyses ***Email Kent A. Kiehl kkiehl(a)unm.edu or fMRIcourse(a)mrn.org with any questions. We hope to see you there. Thanks for your time, and have a great day!

1 0

Infant atlas - finding control points
by Mark Plantz 23 Jun '14

23 Jun '14

Hello freesurfers, I am currently attempting to run recon-all on a set of infant brains with a non-default atlas. I was previously running into a problem where freesurfer was unable to find control points for the various labeled regions of the atlas. It appears as if the “wm_mean” of the atlas and subject are being set to 0. My thought is that the non-deafult atlas was resulting in some sort of null error where everything was just set to zero by default. This resulted in a completely blank “ctrl_points.mgz” and “norm.mgz” files. However, I recently noticed that the “aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz” file looks like the atlas is actually mapping the various regions to the subject’s original T1 file. A screenshot of this file is attached to the e-mail. Does anyone have any ideas why the atlas would map correctly to the aseg file, but then fail to find any control points in those same regions? I attached the log file in case that would help. Thank you! - Mark

1 0

RAS to voxel transform
by Arman Eshaghi 23 Jun '14

23 Jun '14

Hi, I'm trying to understand the conversion from RAS (freesurfer surface coordinate) to volume space (x, y, and z.. According to Graham Wideman documentation here http://www.grahamwideman.com/gw/brain/fs/coords/fscoords.htm (if it is not outdated), Right is negative x, *Anterior is positive z*, and *Superior is positive y*. Just to double check, usign mri_info on a sample T1.mgz in one subject I get this ras to voxel transform: -1 0 0 126.944 0 0 -1 135.16 0 1 0 110.6 0 0 0 1 Assuming we have correctly set the (0, 0, 0), and we can extract R A and S (respectively) coordinates using C++ or Python code it means: Right is negative x, *Anterior is negative z*, and *Superior is positive y* (conflicting coordinates are in vold). Am I missing anything here, or coordinate systems have changed from the probably outdated documentation? Thanks in advance for any input on this rather confusing point. All the best, Arman

2 1

QDEC Error loading the data table
by Mohammed Goryawala 23 Jun '14

23 Jun '14

Hello FreeSurfer Experts, I am trying to run QDEC for a group comparison study. I am following the tutorial found on http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/QdecGroupAnalysis_freev… However, when I try to load my data table it returns the error. ---------------------------------------------------- Loading data table /home/pcopy_project/qdec/qdec.table.dat... Number of columns: 5 fsid column: 1 Number of factors: 4 Number of subjects: 57 Reading discrete factor levels from config file /home/pcopy_project/qdec/gender.levels Female Male done. Reading discrete factor levels from config file /home/pcopy_project/qdec/diagnosis.levels Control Disease done. ERROR: Subject SIYA_001 has an invalid level 'Male' in the gender column INFO: If 'gender' is a discrete factor, then create a file named 'gender.levels' containing the valid factor names one per line. Error loading the data table. -------------------------------------------------------- As you see I have a 'gender.levels' file in the same directory as the data file and it reads it above. I still get the error. I am new to QDEC and any help would be appreciated. Thank you Mohammed Goryawala, PhD Research Associate Department of Radiology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

2 2

Re: [Freesurfer] Why the result was not same for the same subject
by Chiu, Bryan (PHTH) 23 Jun '14

23 Jun '14

There of course is some variability in the analysis due to the way the segmentation happens. Your results are certainly not out of the ordinary for the volume you are viewing. On average you can expect a ~1% variance between several scans of the same subject. If you want to know more I certainly suggest reading the paper titled: "Whole Brain Segmentation: Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain" - Bryan

3 2

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
24
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Freesurfer June 2014