Freesurfer Support,
Thank you for your support with my previous line of questions
regarding design matrix creation.
I have manually created another design matrix and want to ensure that
I designed it correctly.
An example of my FSGD file is as follows below:
Class SITE 1-Male-Control
Class SITE 1-Male-PATIENT
Class SITE 1-Female-Control
Class SITE 1-Female-PATIENT
Class SITE 2-Male-Control
Class SITE 2-Male-PATIENT
Class SITE 2-Female-Control
Class SITE 2-Female-PATIENT
Class SITE 3-Male-Control
Class SITE 3-Male-PATIENT
Class SITE 3-Female-Control
Class SITE 3-Female-PATIENT
Class SITE 4-Male-Control
Class SITE 4-Male-PATIENT
Class SITE 4-Female-Control
Class SITE 4-Female-PATIENT
Variables age_at_scan total_intracranial_volume
study site levels = 1, 2, 3, 4
gender levels = Male, Female
diagnosis levels = PATIENT, Control
age_at_scan = covariate age
total_intracranial_volume = covariate total intracranial volume
What I would ideally like to do is:
1) Take into account offset differences amongst diagnosis, gender, and
study site.
2) Allowing a difference in age slope, and total intracranial volume
slope amongst the diagnosis and gender levels.
3) Modeling the age slope and total intracranial volume slope as the
same for the study site levels.
Let's image that the first participant is from site 1, Male, and
control, and is 12 and has a TIV of 30,000.
The second participant is from site 2, Female, and PATIENT, and is 14,
and has a TIV of 25,000.
My understanding of the design matrix would be as follows:
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 30000 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 25000
-Tim
>Yes, create your matrix manually.
>
>Those matrix lines are not quite right. The ages are in the correct
>column, but you need a 1 somewhere in columns 1-8 to indicate the class
>(ie, site/dx) that the subject is in.
On 05/26/2016 12:57 PM, Timothy Hendrickson wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Thank you for such a prompt response. Just to be clear you are
> recommending that I manually create the matrix file right?
>
> If so I want to ensure that I am understanding how to design the
> matrix file properly.
>
> Let's imagine that the first participant is a control and is 13 and
> the second is a patient and is 15. My understanding is that the matrix
> file would be as follows:
> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0
> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.
>
> -Tim
> Previous correspondences are below:
>
> You'll need a regressor for each of the 8 classes you describe below.
> You can use mri_glmfit to generate this (Xg.dat file)
> You'll need two more regressors for age, one for each diagnosis. If a
> subject (ie, row) is a control then the two values will be AGE 0. If the
> subject of the row is a patient, then the two values will be 0 AGE. You
> can then set up a Controls-Patients age (ie, interaction between dx and
> age) contrast like
> [0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1]
> On 05/24/2016 02:30 PM, Timothy Hendrickson wrote:
> >
> > Freesurfer Support,
> >
> > I'd like to create a design matrix for a group analysis outside of the
> > DODS and DOSS models. I understand that in order to do this the -X
> > flag must be used. However, I have been unable to find examples of how
> > to do this.
> >
> > I am hoping to reveal a difference in thickness or gyrification
> > amongst a clinical population. The data set contains two factors:
> > diagnosis, and study site and one covariate: age. Diagnosis has two
> > levels: controls, and patients. Study site has four levels, one level
> > for each location the data has been collected from.
> >
> > What I would ideally like to do is:
> >
> > 1) Take into account offset differences amongst diagnosis and study site.
> >
> > 2) Allowing a difference in age slope amongst the diagnosis levels
> >
> > 3) Modeling the age slope as the same for the study site levels
> >
> > My FSGD file is designed as follows
> >
> > Class SITE 1-Control
> > Class SITE 1-PATIENT
> > Class SITE 2-Control
> > Class SITE 2-PATIENT
> > Class SITE 3-Control
> > Class SITE 3-PATIENT
> > Class SITE 4-Control
> > Class SITE 4-PATIENT
> > Variables age_at_scan
> >
> > study site levels = 1,2,3 and 4
> > diagnosis levels = PATIENT and Control
> > age_at_scan = covariate age
> >
> > Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Respectfully,
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > --
> > Timothy Hendrickson
> > Department of Psychiatry
> > University of Minnesota
> > Mobile: 507-259-3434 <tel:507-259-3434> (texts okay)