In writing a paper of longitudinal changes in a large heterogeneous
population with no group comparisons, what would be considered "more
important" to include: absolute ROI volumes, or volumes corrected for ICV?
Using ICV corrected volumes makes sense when comparing groups, but when
just describing population changes over time, for example a cross section
of a population over a lifespan, is it better to use absolute volumes,
corrected volumes, or both?