Freesurfer February 2018

freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

119 participants
170 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Hippocampal Subfield Error
by AKUDJEDU, THEOPHILUS 27 Feb '18

27 Feb '18

Dear Eugenio, Attached as requested. Thanks Theo

1 0

Hippocampal Subfield Error
by AKUDJEDU, THEOPHILUS 27 Feb '18

27 Feb '18

Dear Eugenio, Attached are all the log files as requested. Thanks Theo ________________________________ From: AKUDJEDU, THEOPHILUS Sent: 27 February 2018 15:22 To: freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Hippocampal Subfield Error Dear Eugenio, Attached are all the log files as requested. Thanks Theo

1 0

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfield Error
by Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 27 Feb '18

27 Feb '18

Dear Theo, Would you mind sending up the log of the hippocampal subfields as well? Cheers, /Eugenio -- Juan Eugenio Iglesias ERC Senior Research Fellow Translational Imaging Group University College London http://www.jeiglesias.com http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/ From: <freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of "AKUDJEDU, THEOPHILUS" <T.AKUDJEDU1(a)nuigalway.ie> Reply-To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Date: Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 11:13 To: "freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfield Error Dear Eugenio, I executed the command below and it exited with errors (log files attached. Thanks Theo recon-all -all -s CHRM2001 -hippocampal-subfields-T1

1 0

Hippocampal Subfield Error
by AKUDJEDU, THEOPHILUS 27 Feb '18

27 Feb '18

Dear Eugenio, I executed the command below and it exited with errors (log files attached. Thanks Theo recon-all -all -s CHRM2001 -hippocampal-subfields-T1

1 0

Re: [Freesurfer] MRI protocol for hippocampal subfield segmentation
by Gabor Perlaki 27 Feb '18

27 Feb '18

According to Bruce's request I repost the rest of thread: We set up our our hippocampal subfield T2 protocol based on the ADNI protocol (with some minor differences) as suggested by Iglesias. However, we see an artefact similar to the image found in ADNI2 training manual (page 28): http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ ADNI2MRITrainingManual_2014.pdf Please see the hyperintense artefact in the anterior part of the sagittal and axial images. Do you also see this artefact in your images? Do you have any idea about the cause of the artefact or do you have any suggestion on how to get rid of it?

1 0

KWWidgets
by Melvin Robinson 27 Feb '18

27 Feb '18

A FreeSurfer build from source requires KWWidgets, but it has been deprecated for 10 years. What does Freesurfer use this code for?

1 0

aseg and aparcstats2table on longitudinal data
by Lisa Delalande 26 Feb '18

26 Feb '18

Hi FreeSurfer experts, I would like to use the asegstats2table and the aparcstats2table commands on my longitudinal data, that have been processing following the longitudinal pipeline (recon-all -cross, - base and finally -long). And I have two questions : 1) Am I obliged to do the long_stats_slopes --qdec ./qdec/longi_presentacio.qdec.table.dat --stats aseg.stats --meas volume --do-avg --do-rate --do-pc1 --time months command before using the aseg/aparc commands ? 2) And I would like to know which subjectsID I have to choose for the command line, example : asegstats2table --subjects *001_tp1 002_tp1*...etc. (cross)? OR *template_001 template_002*...etc (base)? OR *001_tp1.long.template_001 002_tp1.long.template_002*...etc (long)? Knowing that it's for a comparison test-retest (microlongitudinal : 1 month). Thanks you for your precious help, Best regards, Lisa

2 1

questions about the segamentation volume
by Ting Li 26 Feb '18

26 Feb '18

Hi FreeSurfer Expert, I followed the Anatomical ROI analysis tutorial and make a aseg.vol.table for the 40 subjects. However, the segment volume can various a lot in different subjects, such as Left-Lateral-Ventricle, Left-Inf-Lat-Vent. I attached a screenshot. Thanks for your response. Best wishes, Ting

2 1

FSGD and Contrast to determine the effect of age on performance
by Martin Juneja 26 Feb '18

26 Feb '18

Hi experts, I am not sure if this has already been addressed in FS discussion. If my fsgd file looks like following: Class Male Class Female Variables Performance Age Input S1 Male 181 25 Input S2 Female 167 23 .... .... I understand that the contrast matrix *[**0 0 1 -1 0 0]* represents whether there is a difference between the group (male/female)-performance slopes regressing out the effect of age. In other words, this matrix calculates whether two slopes i.e. one for males: thickness-performance slope and second for females: thickness-performance slope - are significantly different after regressing out the effect of age. My questions are following: (1) Is my above interpretation of contrast matrix *[**0 0 1 -1 0 0]* correct? (2) If my interpretation is correct, then I was wondering what will be the contrast matrix if *I want to check whether there is **significant effect of age on e.g. thickness-performance slopes after regressing out the effect of gender.* And what will be the corresponding fsgd file for that, any changes in that? Thanks.

2 3

Unknown Label in following postprocessing with mne-python
by Daniel van de Velden 26 Feb '18

26 Feb '18

Dear fellow colleagues, in my study I use volumetric source spaces. In the process of creating them, I decided to identify all available volumelabels FreeSurfer "recognized" in the given mri image. Every single subject inherits, despite all other volumelabels, a volumelabel called "Unknown". In an 3D representation of those "unknown" volumelabel coordinates I opine those points could also be part of other volumelabels like cerebral cortex or white matter. Would you please give me a detailed explanation of the origin of this 'Unknown' label? Specifically in respect to the fsaverage "subject". Best regards, Daniel van de Velden

2 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
17
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Freesurfer February 2018