---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Siddharth Srivastava <siddys(a)gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] cropping of average T1
To: Bruce Fischl <fischl(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
ok.. i will try that and let you know... what other image/logs can i provide
for
localizing the source of the error?
sid.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Bruce Fischl <fischl(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>wrote:
> not really, it seems like there is a bug. If you can localize it to just
> one or a few subjects it would a lot easier to track down
>
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Siddharth Srivastava wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>> These are about 28 images. I have not tried fewer...do you
>> think there
>> are some images with incorrect orientation in the cohort? That would show
>> up
>> in the other location in the average i think...
>> sid.
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Bruce Fischl <fischl(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> >wrote:
>>
>> I don't think so. How many subjects? Have you tried fewer?
>>>
>>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Siddharth Srivastava wrote:
>>>
>>> The surfaces look all right. It happens only to T1. It cant be a display
>>>
>>>> problem, can it??
>>>> sid.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Bruce Fischl <
>>>> fischl(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> that is strange. Do the surfaces look ok? How many subjects are you
>>>>
>>>>> averaging? Does this happen if you only average one or a few?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Siddharth Srivastava wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am attaching a tiff file showing the tkmedit view of
>>>>>> the average
>>>>>> T1 that freesurfer created during make_average_subject. I am a bit
>>>>>> concerned
>>>>>>
>>>>>> about the cropping that is evident at the posterior aspect of the
>>>>>> brain.
>>>>>> The
>>>>>>
>>>>>> individual T1's are complete and ok, so i am guessing that something
>>>>>> went
>>>>>> wrong during the transform of the individual brain during the process.
>>>>>> Can
>>>>>> anyone help me find out the problem ? The average surfaces also look
>>>>>> all
>>>>>> right.
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>> sid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>