13 Sep
2010
13 Sep
'10
11:19 a.m.
no, those are not valid. cc is not a cortical structure. use the measurements from the aseg.stats file (for volume only).
n.
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:57 -0400, Alan Francis wrote:
Hi Nick:
I processed around 183 brains using 4.0.3 a few years ago. I have numbers on the CC volume, thickness SA and Curvature. Are these not valid anymore?
thanks,
Alan
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Nick Schmansky nicks@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: corpuscallosum was removed from the parc stats because it is not a valid cortical structure (the thickness measure was not applicable).
n. On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:05 +0200, Jordi Delgado wrote: > > Dear FS experts, > > We are using the 4.3.1 version of FreeSurfer, and we have noticed that > in the lh.aparc.stats/rh.aparc.stats file there are 35 structures > calculated and not 36 structures, only corpuscallosum is missing. > > We have also compared it with an old subject processing (using 4.0.2 > version of FreeSurfer) where corpuscallosum structure has been > calculated... > > Is this a known bug or maybe have we an error in our FS configuration > or recon-all parameters? > > Thank you in advance, > /Jordi. > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.