Thanks Bruce, this is going to be very helpful.
One thing I have not understood from the statistics freesurfer outputs is why average thickness is not exactly the ratio between volume and surface area. This is just a small curiosity though.
Best regards. Dorian On Jul 23, 2014 3:40 PM, "Bruce Fischl" fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Dorian
yes, that would work.
cheers Bruce
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Dorian P. wrote:
Hi all, A while ago I asked how can I calculate the average thickness of the
three
lateral temporal gyri, and Bruce kindly suggested to draw the label on fsaverage and use transforms to calculate it for each subject. I may try
to
do that, but given my time constrains and my level of knowledge of Freesurger I thought an alternative method:
Say for example I have the inferior, middle, and superior temporal gyrus with surface areas of 1000, 2000, and 3000. They also have an average thickness of 2, 3, and 4mm, respectively. Given that these thicknesses
are
distributed in those areas, I could weight each region accordingly and calculate the average thickness as:
( (1000*2) + (2000*3) + (3000*4) ) / (1000+2000+3000) = 20000/6000 = 3.33
Is this logic correct, and why yes or no?
Thank you in advance. Dorian TJU
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.