Hi Kamy,
The QA tools are actually developed outside of our lab. It might be helpful to contact the Reuter lab directly - https://github.com/Deep-MI/qatools-python
best Andrew
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of "Wakim, Kathryn-Mary" KathrynMary_Wakim@urmc.rochester.edu Reply-To: FS Help freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Date: Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 7:51 PM To: FS Help freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: [Freesurfer] QAtools with Freesurfer version 6.0
External Email - Use Caution Hi all,
I’m relatively new to Freesurfer, and I am just beginning to check the output of my recon-alls using QAtools. However, I’m running into a number of difficulties and errors with QAtools, and I’m wondering if this tool is not yet optimized for the current version of Freesurfer.
I have attached the recon_checker.All.summary.log output from QA tools. Below, I’ve also highlighted some of the errors and issues I see in the recon_chcker log file. Please note thatt, per the subject’s recon-all log file, recon-all ran to completion with no errors.
Overview of recon_checker errors:
1) ERROR: Subject 10201003 missing output file ../mri/nu_noneck.mgz
* Note: this is repeated for a number of different output files 2) ERROR: Recon-all steps missing in subject 10201003 status file 3) View your snapshots by opening this file in an internet browser:
* Note: I have attached a screenshot of the output .html file in-browser. Note that I have installed and verified installation of ImageMagick.
Thank you very much for your help, Kamy Wakim