no, I don't think it means that. It has more to do with the overall shape of the brain I believe, but we've never really investigated it On Sat, 30 Apr 2011, Tetiana Dadakova wrote:
Dear Bruce, Allison,
Thank you for your answer.
In tkmedit the surfaces look good. Can this concavity mean that sulci are deeper in this region as compared to neighboring regions? I am not sure I understand how to interpret the inflated surface, therefore I cannot control if it is correct.
Best wishes, Tanja.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
I agree, sometimes this happens in the inflated surface and I don't think it's cause for concern
Bruce On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Allison Stevens wrote:
When you look at the case in tkmedit, in that same area, do you see an error? Looking at your snapshot, it looks like it could be normal.
On Apr 26, 2011, at 8:45 AM, Tetiana Dadakova tetiana.d@gmail.com wrote:
Dear FreeSurfer list,
When I look at inflated surface of my subjects (healthy males and females), almost all of them have a concavity in the posterior part of the brain (the arrow in attached image). It doesn't look correct to me. What can cause this problem?
Thank you, Tanja. <tksurfer.tiff> _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.