Thanks Bruce. FYI, I got a couple of other emails off list. One of them reminded me that the original ADNI protocol had this resolution. Cheers, Souheil
On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Souheil
our standard acquisition used to be 1.33x1x1 so I don't think there should be any problem (although it has been a long time since we used to get those - 1.5T and single channel)
cheers Bruce On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Inati, Souheil (NIH/NIMH) [E] wrote:
A colleague has some mprage scans collected on a 3T sagittally 1mmx1mm in plane, 1.3mm thick. The SNR and CNR are pretty good. I figured I'd ping the list to see if anyone have any experience running scans with the slightly thickish voxels through the recon-all pipeline. Anything I ought to look out for in particular?
Thanks, Souheil
Souheil Inati, PhD Staff Scientist, Functional MRI Facility NIMH/NIH/DHHS souheil.inati@nih.gov _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.