On 9/16/13 1:43 PM, Anita van Loenhoud wrote:
Hi Doug,
Thanks for your reply. I was using 1.3 for visualization and 2 for simulation. So that's probably where it went wrong? When I set both thresholds to 2, significant clusters after Monte Carlo were also there before the simulation.
Yes, that was the problem.
Just to double-check: can the values associated with these significant clusters be different before and after Monte Carlo? For example, before Monte Carlo the value of the rostralmiddlefrontal was -4.42, after Monte Carlo it's -2.19. That's normal, right?
What maps are you looking at specifically? Before correction, each voxel has a different value, so it would not make sense to talk about a single value for the RMF. doug
Thanks again,
Anita _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer