Here ya go (to list)
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Jonathan Holt whatsdac@umich.edu wrote:
Here ya go.
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Martin Reuter <mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
wrote:
No, it's not nifti, that should work.
Can you send me your log file and the command you issued.
Thanks, Martin
On 07/01/2013 03:13 PM, Jonathan Holt wrote:
Martin,
definitely passing my images and naming time points appropriately. I have been passing nifti as opposed to dicom and it's entirely possible that may be the issue?
jon On Jul 1, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Martin Reuter wrote:
Hi Jon,
are you passing your images? <tpNid> is a placeholder for the id of your subject+time point, for example it could be jon_01 the "path_to_tpN_dcm" needs to specify the path to the dicom files, point it to the first file in the MPRAGE series (or multi echo mprage or what you are using). This is the full path on your file system to that file.
Best, Martin
On 07/01/2013 02:29 PM, Jonathan Holt wrote:
I have tried to inspect the tal xfms that were created in the brief time this string was running
recon-all -all -s <tpNid> -i path_to_tpN_dcm
while viewing orig.mgz in tkmedit. they were talairach.xfm and talairach.auto.xfm, both were empty and the tkmedit window was empty.
upon further inspection the log file is complaining about my nifty.
WARNING: neither NIfTI-1 qform or sform are valid WARNING: your volume will probably be incorrectly oriented $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.7 2012/09/05 21:55:16 mreuter Exp $ reading from /net/data4/ALSSCI/FreeSurfer201211/Subjects/DT/100922dt/anatomy/ht1spgr.nii... TR=1000.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00 WARNING: it does not appear that there was sufficient information
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
can you cc the list so that others can answer?
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Jonathan Holt wrote:
I have not and I am not certain how to do so
On Jul 1, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Jon
have you visually inspected the results of the tal xform? Bruce On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Jonathan Holt wrote:
Log file indicates manual talairach alignment may be necessary.
ERROR: talairach_afd: Talairach Transform: transforms/talairach.xfm ***FAILED*** (p=0.0079, pval=0.0000 < threshold=0.0050) Manual Talairach alignment may be necessary Can anyone provide direction. Alternatively, the error indicates talairach alignment can be skipped with -notal-check flag. Is this step completely necessary? jon
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing listFreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
-- Martin Reuter, Ph.D. Assistant in Neuroscience - Massachusetts General Hospital Instructor in Neurology - Harvard Medical School MGH / HMS / MIT
A.A.Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging 149 Thirteenth Street, Suite 2301 Charlestown, MA 02129
Phone: +1-617-724-5652 Email: mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu reuter@mit.edu Web : http://reuter.mit.edu
-- Martin Reuter, Ph.D. Assistant in Neuroscience - Massachusetts General Hospital Instructor in Neurology - Harvard Medical School MGH / HMS / MIT
A.A.Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging 149 Thirteenth Street, Suite 2301 Charlestown, MA 02129
Phone: +1-617-724-5652 Email: mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu reuter@mit.edu Web : http://reuter.mit.edu