Hi Xi-Nian,
As Doug said, they don't do the same thing. The method in the paper uses a different kind of interpolation to allows the preservation of the amount of area, whereas mris_preproc achieves the same globally using a Jacobian correction. The results aren't expected to be identical at the vertex level or for small regions.
An implementation of the method we proposed in the paper is available for Octave and/or Matlab at http://brainder.org/download/areal It works fine, but beware that it's quite slow.
All the best,
Anderson
2013/5/13 Douglas Greve greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Hi Xi-Nian, it does not do the same thing, but it does something similar. Anderson found that it gave similar results in a lot of cases, but he has found some differences. If he's still following the FS list, maybe he can comment.
doug
On 5/11/13 9:53 PM, Xinian Zuo wrote:
Hello Doug,
I am doing some association studies between functional measures and surface area. In using mris_preproc, there is an option --area. Does this do sth similar to that as Winkler et al. (2012)?
Winkler et al., 2012. Measureing and comparing brain cortical surfacearea and other areal quantities.
Thank you very much.
Xi-Nian Zuo, Ph.D of Applied Mathematics (http://lfcd.psych.ac.cn) Google Scholar Citations: http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=a3-gVGMAAAAJ&hl=en
Freesurfer mailing listFreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.