External Email - Use Caution
Why you didn't run recon-all directly ?
Le sam. 27 août 2022 à 11:32, Giulio Siracusano siracusanogiulio@gmail.com a écrit :
External Email - Use CautionHello,
this is true (i.e. reproducibility) for ASEG (when running recon-all -all).
But, if you use SAMSEG (i.e. running run_samseg instead) you get slightly different results everytime. This is regardless you use -threads flag or not.
My command line is (using the file I've provided in the link in my previous email):
run_samseg --input ./I18211_ADNI_12M4_TS_2_20060706103342_2.nii --output /usr/local/freesurfer/7.2.0/subjects/002_S_0685-I18211/SAMSEG_NIF
either using this version (1-thread) or a multi-thread
run_samseg --input ./I18211_ADNI_12M4_TS_2_20060706103342_2.nii --output /usr/local/freesurfer/7.2.0/subjects/002_S_0685-I18211/SAMSEG_NIF -threads 6
You get always slightly different results.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://secure-web.cisco.com/1BaXjhVNrGgKUE0ji0Yu6JwJ0c-v0Yav3FCTn-Pmifu2KBC... The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at https://secure-web.cisco.com/1v-fNrOTB8umkRyirv-tSwOU32ZLWx2tJa1L9M92K50aC2f... < https://secure-web.cisco.com/1v-fNrOTB8umkRyirv-tSwOU32ZLWx2tJa1L9M92K50aC2f... . Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do not wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of this message immediately. Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.