Hi Shannon,
that cannot be. It either indicates a serious bug (which we have not yet encountered in our data) or a problem with your processing.
Can you send me: - the version you use - the command line you run - the output you get
Also long_mris_slopes is designed for analyzing surface maps (analysis on a vertex by vertex basis). This is usually thickness. So I don't understand what 'volumes' you mean? For an ROI analysis based on stats files you need to use long_stats_slopes.
Best, Martin
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 11:37 -1000, Shannon Kogachi wrote:
Hi Martin, Each subject has 3-6 timepoints. They are all about one year apart. Here's an example of the discrepancy: one subject with 5 timepoints had volumes that ranged from 2.2-2.4. However, from the long_mris_slopes command, the temporal average volume was calculated to be 1.67. Thanks for your help!
-Shannon K.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Martin Reuter mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi Shannon,
long_mris_slopes works for surface maps (both thickness and volume should work). In both cases it should compute the temporal average. I have another scripts that works for stats files (long_stats_slopes) in the same way. How many time points do you have, how far apart (equally spaced?). Best, Martin On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 14:59 -1000, Shannon Kogachi wrote: > Hi Martin, > When I used the long_mris_slopes command for the thickness, the > average thickness calculated in FreeSurfer was pretty similar to > averaging the values in FreeSurfer. Does this command only work > thickness measures and not for volume or area? Thanks! > > -Shannon > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Martin Reuter > <mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > Hi Shannon > > You probably mean average thickness. > My scripts compute the temporal average from the linear fit > (at mid time), which can be differed from simply averaging > values. > Best Martin > > Shannon Kogachi <skogachi@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I had a question about how the temporal average is > calculated for subjects with multiple timepoints. I > used the long_mris_slopes command on a longitudinal > set of data. However, when I compared the average > volumes calculated through this command to the average > volumes calculated in excel after extracting the same > vertices at the individual timepoints, these values > did not match up. The average volumes calculated > through long_mris_slopes were smaller. Please let me > know if there is a way to explain this discrepancy. > Thank you! > > -Shannon K. > > > > ______________________________________________________ > > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > -- > Sent from my phone, please excuse brevity. > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person > to whom it is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error > and the e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners > Compliance HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was > sent to you in error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the > sender and properly > dispose of the e-mail. > > > > > > --