Hi Dough,
This might be a very basic question: I would like to compare the results of an analysis with the perrun and persession motion correction. Here is my analysis line:
*mkanalysis-sess *
* -analysis Cat_all_new -fsd bold -runlistfile runlist_all.txt *
* -native -mcextreg -stc siemens -fwhm 0 *
* -event-related -paradigm para_cat.par -nconditions 5 *
* -spmhrf 0 -TR 2 -refeventdur 4 -polyfit 2* * * * * * And here is what I have in my analysis info
analysis Cat_1 mcstem fmc fsd bold runlistfile run_1.txt TR 2 RegDOF 6 RawSpace volume native mask brain RawFWHM 0 RawSTC siemens UseB0DC 0 inorm 100 acfbins 30 fixacf 1 acffwhm 20 acfsvd 0 designtype event-related nskip 0 polyfit 2 HPFCutoffHz 0 HeteroGCor 0 nconditions 5 parname para_cat.par RefEventDur 3 timewindow 40.000000 prestim 0 TER 0.050000 spmhrf 0 stimulusdelay -1.00000000000000000000 Condition 1 Condition01 Condition 2 Condition02 Condition 3 Condition03 Condition 4 Condition04 Condition 5 Condition05 nuisreg mcextreg 3
I preprocessed my data once using the perrun option and once using the persession option in two different directories and ran the analysis on both of those data sets. The problem is when the analysis finished the results where practically identical. I am not sure what is going on and can't figure out if the analysis in both cases is done based on the persession motion correction or they are both done based on the perrun motion correction and how I can get the analysis to run in two different ways. I am using freesurfer 5.1.
M *