The stimulus duration is just the amount of time that optseq will allocate to the stimulus. You can fill it however you like, so 300 + 1700 null is ok.
As to whether the stimulus onset should be synchronous with your TR, there are some other considerations. If you are going to assume a shape to the hemodynamic response, then it is not important (and many people prefer to do it this way)-- you can set dPSD as small as you like (though it might take a while). If you are not going to assume a shape (ie, an FIR model), then you are going to lose statistical power by a factor of TR/dPSD
doug
Bosky Ravindranath wrote:
Hello List, We are designing a rapid event related paradigm, wherein a stimulus is presented for a duration of 300ms. We have been using optseq for generating sequences in the past, however , optseq requires that the event duration be a multiple of of TR or dPSD( sampling interval). In that case is it ok to create a design with a stimulus duration of 2 s ( which is our TR) and then split it into 300ms + 1700 ms, where the 1700 ms adds to the null period immediately following the stimulus? ( There is a null condition between each stimulus). Also, is it not important to start a new volume at the beginning of each stimulus? Any input is appreciated. Regards, Bosky Ravindranath
Laboratory for the Study of Emotion and Cognition, Stony Brook University, NY,11790
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer