basically, you should not have been using the beta version since it is a beta version. hard to know what the differences were
On 4/20/2022 6:21 PM, Paul Wighton wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Matt,
freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v6.0.0-2beb96c was compiled from this commit of the source code on Jan 18, 2017 *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be* https://github.com/freesurfer/freesurfer/commit/2beb96c6099d96508246c14a2413... https://secure-web.cisco.com/1R8sitpPrVS-YQ5moGJknSMxciGckoDhuS0Y3u2-hSRaaPooepbj4aav__WDyLe57fmXppmrQZY7HsTnQ5NF0_qgy7pnlM18bKmBFjjtgzs_9YiFmUaZnwHT0T5Mo3z8NBUP7mCwVRmpwM65WtcYYd8Sn1fPpDvkHk2v5z7KXVqV0MC_4eeWrlDtElq-B2UqjdJ4jmktaAG7bwA8oLN6LkOl4PR8PppbQZp4Rxi-Zue8nFv9TONJMjtYiu4ARqwLAM4uz4KV8pcF_5bVJb2gvPbfHa_dVleN6BSes6p4mDdSZ_7WcMVup5_qO1nJtoIUv/https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ffreesurfer%2Ffreesurfer%2Fcommit%2F2beb96c6099d96508246c14a24136863124566a3
Judging by the datestring of freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta-20151015, I'm guessing it was compiled from this commit on Oct 14, 2015. *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be* https://github.com/freesurfer/freesurfer/commit/b654364c9bc0365a5063050f1183... https://secure-web.cisco.com/1kuCwHQZ7fhj8ZvwaC70Nl-0S10KUJ52NEMXAi1sH8IPI8lsz9_orzp1YjRT90OexzRAXf2TW5aq_5b24jXDSYQA5VRhjF-PLrDMt7RoigpYgxPMoUGrm44b2n1tC0fURm__rl95Xddcu7f0vH7xbMM5uKVZbpgesphWHy1ilix3IZ0ac4c7ZMvGF24PblwGaVAM3wt5Uve-mDtmEM5T2ANk4bZ46NqIoQCDSP86eE2WOIDDFinENqczAY0rfj4dyw6CVp5-cMUKxyvqWtgKL9D4qcYPPey3nko5jyUmFbtx8a6QNOoh12xKdK3hvriCt/https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ffreesurfer%2Ffreesurfer%2Fcommit%2Fb654364c9bc0365a5063050f118384e7be4d2508
There are tons of differences between these two releases and I would not expect identical results.
-Paul
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 1:51 PM Hoptman, Matthew (NKI) Matthew.Hoptman@nki.rfmh.org wrote:
External Email - Use Caution Hi all, I have access to a system that has both freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v6.0.0-2beb96c vs. freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta-20151015 Could someone please let me know what the primary differences are between these versions? They have been used exclusively to get volumes/thickness/surface area. Should those values be identical? Thanks, Matt Prounouns: He/Him/His IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail is meant only for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain confidential information which is legally privileged or otherwise protected by law. If you received this e-mail in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, you are strictly prohibited from reviewing, using, disseminating, distributing or copying the e-mail. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. Thank you for your cooperation. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail is meant only for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain confidential information which is legally privileged or otherwise protected by law. If you received this e-mail in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, you are strictly prohibited from reviewing, using, disseminating, distributing or copying the e-mail. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be* https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1R_R7BKR-RcxW6kBqoYqKjIraebIAfu_iQLvQxYEGsWO-609xJXYit02o5h1BT09DKTfxPn5umrf5hGgtoSyzQRwqPgCHhf3aPhXoHjBu2jbKv4aH1noZEtWw4Srnn3wTXwQDRL5JKa-JkiMAHDdd4wc_ysPTHrY3XkyLCelWFxuPFOf22g99ZE6-RTRmLcOsiriDztcXZ5_ycKTPkP7E1yMwh-U-FMKh9pgCRiy8L_T_5YLJH7GTw_-3vS72R_koZsd2NhXK07zG0tF1cctWUAsjjDdLPKZkMcda6wl-QXqACTJXC0oK99q0AnmoUuwc/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be* https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1FTxkwKATSZWfpawhdrjNC83b0j1gh-c19zFIbpm7dAR0Ax2JH02LIXDSzUqe68veoOkoMLhCxT8R9tqGVTwctw0Nohkm6HF7DLpMN0Z3vkiZzBOSa5kdXACqnNAW0JMfOaMQlTwbhzn6ia0muo6ePVz9uVdBQJS2hrjcpiZErhy3kYjFCWwTwprbtIZW_sN29yNPTyuPirig7uhmXPSXZDSgkyqLTqNfTc2jsXc_ChZw1pjz_cU91qPcL3mdy5ZAFuUNNC7s_We0_95JHpEnp6RgZOOvtN5x6qWSk6okWGPQ5uYSOnEhycTOLDcqx-2M/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.massgeneralbrigham.org%2Fcomplianceline> <*MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be* https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1FTxkwKATSZWfpawhdrjNC83b0j1gh-c19zFIbpm7dAR0Ax2JH02LIXDSzUqe68veoOkoMLhCxT8R9tqGVTwctw0Nohkm6HF7DLpMN0Z3vkiZzBOSa5kdXACqnNAW0JMfOaMQlTwbhzn6ia0muo6ePVz9uVdBQJS2hrjcpiZErhy3kYjFCWwTwprbtIZW_sN29yNPTyuPirig7uhmXPSXZDSgkyqLTqNfTc2jsXc_ChZw1pjz_cU91qPcL3mdy5ZAFuUNNC7s_We0_95JHpEnp6RgZOOvtN5x6qWSk6okWGPQ5uYSOnEhycTOLDcqx-2M/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.massgeneralbrigham.org%2Fcomplianceline>> . Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do not wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of this message immediately. Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer