10 Oct
2012
10 Oct
'12
9:26 p.m.
I think 5.1 specifically has a problem with Talairach accuracy (is that right Nick?). Should be much better with the next release On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Eric Cunningham wrote:
Hi Bruce, I am running version 5.10 Thanks, -Eric
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi Eric
what version are you running? Bruce On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Eric Cunningham wrote: Greetings, I am trying to determine how bad a talairach.xfm registration has to be to warrant a manual edit. I have found that even minor edits can have noticable (9%) effects on major subcortical volumes (such as thalamus or hippocampus). Very few registrations seem to have completely failed, but most seem like they could be made better by a tweak here or there. At what point would I just be adding randomness by manually editing? About what percent of a given dataset would you expect to manually edit? Much appreciated, -Eric CunninghamThe information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.