Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:54:48 -0500 From: fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu To: horton_paul@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] longitudinal analysis
Hi Paul
can you cc the list so that others can answer?
thanks Bruce On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, paul horton wrote:
Hi Brian,
Thanks for your reply.
I am running freesurfer 4.5.0. We are using the older version so that the analyses performed are the same across subjects.
Best wishes
Paul
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:21:05 -0500 From: fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu To: horton_paul@hotmail.com CC: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] longitudinal analysis
Hi Paul
what is the actual binary being run?
Bruce On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, paul horton wrote:
Hi guys,
I am currently running a longitudinal analysis on a set of scan. It is currently running and so far it has taken 5 days. It seems to be taking a large amount of time on a process called labelling slice. I have run the same analysis on other subjects which took about 6 hours to complete. So
I
was wondering if you know of any reason why a set of scans would take long
er
to process than others. I have checked the inital scans and nothing seems obviously wrong with them.
Best Wishes
Paul
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.