Great - thanks,
Matthew
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
yes, it's fine
Bruce On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Matthew
we typically ask people to get licenses from us so we can keep track of them.
So, what we want to do, is to put this single data file into a bitbucket repository, that we then pull down when we want to run the tests. For example - here is the data repository we currently use for our tests of reading freesurfer files:
https://bitbucket.org/nipy/nitest-freesurfer/src
There we used the Freesurfer software agreement for the data files:
https://bitbucket.org/nipy/nitest-freesurfer/src/df9ccc64adb8f2e1e39e99c1ad2...
We want to add the data file I mentioned, to this repository, so we can test some newer features, but I wanted to make sure I put the proper license.
Is the Freesurfer software agreement OK for the bert/surf/lh.inflated.nofix file as well?
Cheers2,
Matthew _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.