If you can setup your scanner, these parameters are optimal:
http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~andre/Sequences/SagMPR8Min.html
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 11:32 +0800, Feng-Xian Yan wrote:
Hi, I have a problem about which image is the best to run. I had ran the 1.5T data in freesurfer. Because the contrast of the 1.5T data was too bad, I use the 3T data and rerun again. When I run, it says the warning,
WARNING ============++++++++++++++++++++++++======================== The physical sizes are (1404.00 mm, 256.00 mm, 256.00 mm), which cannot fit in 256^3 mm^3 volume. The resulting volume will have 1404 slices. The freesurfer tools should be able to handle more than 256 slices. If you find problems, please let us know (freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu). =====================++++++++++++++++++++++++===============
This problem confused me. What can I do? Could you tell me what image is freesurfer I can run and get the best results? (about dimension…. )
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer