Hi Antonella, I'm not sure what the problem is. You found clusters that are significant but the raw values are not different? doug
Antonella Kis wrote:
Dear Doug,
I know as you told me in past that the average value for the cortical thickness in significant clusters is given in the cache.th20.neg.y.ocn.dat file under lh-Avg-thickness-age-Cor file. 1).Is there another way to get the cortical thickness for the significant clusters, other than read them from the cache.th20.neg.y.ocn.dat file? Analyzing my results for patients in lh with abnormal left side (due epilepsy) I realize that my cortical thickness values in this patients are not different (small difference) from the controls values.
2)Maybe I did a mistake while setting the FSGD (Y.fsgd) or what other mistake I could do because the cortical thickness should be different in this patients versus controls?
I attached my FSGD matrix as well as my cortical thickness values in the significant clusters.
Thank you very much for your time and help. AK