Johnathan, can you point us to source of the issues you are concerned about? Is there a paper or website? thanks doug
On 6/8/16 9:46 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Jonathan
as far as we know, FreeSurfer is the most reliable and robust longitudinal brain morphometry tool that is publicly available. We are working to improve it (always!), but the answer to your question is yes, certainly 5.3 and the upcoming 6.0 are both excellent longitudinal tools Bruce
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Greenberg, Jonathan wrote:
Hello Are the volume and thickness measures in FreeSurfer's aseg.stats and aparc.stats accurate and reliable enough to assess changes in volume and thickness longitudinally? I have heard there have been some accuracy/reliability issues in these files in older versions of FreeSurfer. Is the data in these files strong enough to base a publication on? Thanks! Jonathan
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer