Here is a pic of the inflated.nofix, how do I know what to edit? I've checked the wm.mgz and it looks fine (at least I can't see any errors). Maybe I'm missing something, I've attached a shot of it as well. Thanks.
-Derin
look at the ?h.inflated.nofix to see what is causing the defect, and correct the wm.mgz manually to remove it. Jenni: can you point Derin at the appropriate wiki page?
thanks, Bruce
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Derin Cobia wrote:
The ?h.orig.nofix looks ok, meaning it follows the white-gray boundary appropriately. What should I try next?
-Derin
this is probably a topology fixing problem. Look at the ?h.orig.nofix and see how it is On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Derin Cobia wrote:
Did you mean wm.mgz? It looks fine. The orig surface is not good either. Here's a pic.
-Derin
Hi Derin,
What does the orig surface look like? and the wm? Are those correct?
Jenni
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Derin Cobia wrote:
I have two subjects where the white surface does not follow the gray-white gradient (see attached pic for example). Is there any way to fix this? I'm assuming it has to do with the limitations of my scan too (it's FLASH data). I'm running 3.0.4, thanks.
-Derin
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
