I decided to test against Rocky and CentOS Stream as they should have the same inconsistency as Alma (same libraries). The results are identical: [Table Description automatically generated] From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of fsbuild fsbuild@contbay.com Date: Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:14 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] HPC Usage - Moving On from CentOS7
External Email - Use Caution We don’t use Alma OS which I believe is somewhere downstream from the official RedHat CentOS8 Stream distribution, i.e., the libs may not be the same. I also don’t see that RedHat CentOS8* releases include CentOS7 versions of libraries.
- R.
On Mar 30, 2023, at 12:12, Horn, Mitchell Jacob MJHORN@mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
As an update I’ve tested another run (bert, 7.2.0, no flags, recon-all) on an OS-8 system but set LD_PRELOAD to the 7 system’s libm.so:
export LD_PRELOAD=/alma/cos7lib/libm.so recon-all ….
And that produced the equivalent results of all my CentOS7 runs:
<image002.png>
I believe this is very important information to the general community for stability with the imminent and inevitable switch to OS-8 HPC platforms.
Best, Mitch _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurferhttps://secure-web.cisco.com/1B6HYjaD58teLd8kQAFAoHcbINfWos_Odjqm1uUcjpYlXltcBY5-Pe4gnq6ErXMVdaae2vCWl159gMoIKkhC0MaUdpZiMUk0pAkXBceoZQigvnOmY17QcZ1lsOGzDOTF2GNFMtw1zh-mdp_lHPfv6WBi--IDzT-vHmRi-sgoQvOOS7sTRtXjj471Jl6u1XGY5n6PsmvLZZGN1jNj0Y5nIxgADkQZemoQ_AWmm7iNOgpQYBtEi3XvdZBJTcT4nNV55rl-BhnqIT9paMQc_0qpId-SvO5Gz2zrwcasB-TAwNybYtey2UIYjMtB9m5ARRLgJ/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer
