11 Jun
2012
11 Jun
'12
9:25 a.m.
Greetings,
Considering mris_preproc pipeline, I guess that the concatenated output doesn't provide each subject's resamapled and registered "topological" surface in his native space, rather, it encapsulates the interpolated .curv (scalar) data only in a common template space. But, what is the best approach to have subject-wise topological surfaces which all share the same number of vertices and are anatomically registered (i.e. vertex #s are in correspondence), but each surface is still in its native subject space?
Thanks in advance, Sourena Soheili