Hi Damien,
I have tested using the HighResRecon vs Freesurfer beta on 0.7 mm^3 data and have preferred the segmentations on the beta version.
Cheers,
*Dr Kevin Aquino* Research fellow, Sir Peter Mansfield Magnetic Resonance Center, The University of Nottingham.
Honorary Research Fellow School of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney
*E* Kevin.aquino@nottingham.ac.uk, aquino@physics.usyd.edu.au | *W* www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~aquino/
----------------------------------------------
The brain is a wonderful organ. It starts working the moment you get up and does not stop until you get into the office. - Robert Frost
CRICOS 00026A This email plus any attachments to it are confidential. Any unauthorised use is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete it and any attachments.
Please think of our environment and only print this e-mail if necessary.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Damien MARIE damien.marie@unige.ch wrote:
Dear experts,
I plan to process some MRI 7T data, 0.6 mm^3 isotropic voxel size. The aim is to look a R1 maps.
I was wondering what was your opinion concerning the downsampling to 1 mm^3 (performed by the current FreeSurfer version if I am correct). What do you think would be the best: FreeSurfer 5.3 , FreeSurfer 5.3-HCP or FreeSurfer beta 6.0?
Thank You and Best,
Damien
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.