24 Oct
2016
24 Oct
'16
9:49 p.m.
Hi FreeSurfer experts,
I am currently performing some cortical thickness comparisons in my group of subjects and using mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir my_dir --cache 2.3010 --cwpalthresh 0.05 --2spaces found some clusters that have significantly different cortical thickness values,
Given Eklund et al PNAS paper, do you suggest I should rather use mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir my_dir --sim perm 5000 1.3 perm.pos.13 --sim-sign pos
in order to convince that the results are not due to false positive?
Thanks
Regards